Not exact matches
The Economist notes that slowing down the pace of innovation
in the name of
human stability mean
seem wise on the surface, but it can actually have the opposite
effect:
To me this appears the most satisfactory interpretation of the present state of Life on the surface of the earth; despite a regrettable recrudescence of racialism and nationalism which, impressive though it may be, and disastrous
in its
effect upon our private post-war lives,
seems to have no scientific importance
in the overall process: for the reason that any
human tendency to fragmentation, regardless of its extent and origin, is clearly of an order of magnitude inferior to the planetary forces (geographic, demographic, economic and psychic) whose constantly and naturally growing pressure must sooner or later compel us willy - nilly to unite
in some form of
human whole organized on the basis of
human solidarity.
And it is because the total Unity of which we dream still
seems to beckon
in two different directions, towards the zenith and towards the horizon, that we see the dramatic growth of a whole race of «spiritual expatriates» —
human beings torn between a Marxism whose depersonalizing
effect revolts them and a Christianity so lukewarm
in human terms that it sickens them.
10 Certain recent discussions of environmental ethics, dealing with «respect for nature» (where nature is not necessarily limited to the realm of living things), reflect some affinities with Hall's ideas on «deference» and
seem to pose a challenge to my suggestion that the pursuit of power over nature should be criticized primarily
in terms of its negative
effects on
human values and experiences.
It wasn't simply that these were more active because of the energy boost: the
effects seem to be down to the neurochemical dopamine, which plays a role
in the reward system
in humans.
As you said it is an extremely small number of differences that you find genetically between
humans and chimps, but it is an extremely important one, and what
seems to make it so important is that a lot o these differences
seem to affect what are
in effect regulatory sequences.
Yeah, what's actually sort of gratifying when you look at some of the differences that
seemed to be showing up is that that a lot of these most significant tiny differences
in the genomes between the
humans and the chimps aren't exactly where you would think they would be
in terms of their
effects.
The words
seem too small to encompass what he was really viewing — watching a kidney,
in effect, regrow itself, the
human body enacting its own salamander nature.
«If the
effects of alcohol on memories to fearful responses are similar
in humans to what we observe
in mice, then it
seems that our work helps us better understand how traumatic memories form and how to target better therapies for people
in therapy for PTSD.
The researchers also speculate that because the
effects of eye contact on
human cognition
seem to be
in general positive, eye contact may have therapeutic potential.
Humans and adult chimps
seem more likely to catch a yawn when the original yawner is someone they know, but experiments
in puppies have not found the same familiarity
effect, and the researchers didn't see this
in budgies either.
The Gut Metagenome Changes
in Parallel to Waist Circumference, Brain Iron Deposition and Cognitive Function JCEM June 7, 2017 Gerard Blasco, Jose Maria Moreno - Navarrete, Mireia Rivero, Vicente Perez - Brocal, Josep Garre - Olmo, Josep Puig, Pepus Daunis - i - Estadella, Carles Biarnes, Jordi Gich, Fernando Fernandez - Aranda, Angel Alberich - Bayarri, Andres Moya, Salvador Pedraza, Wifredo Ricart, Miguel Lopez, Manuel Portero - Otin, and Jose - Manuel Fernandez - Real Microbiota perturbations
seem to exert modulatory
effects on emotional behavior, stress - and pain - modulation systems
in adult animals; however, limited information is available
in humans...
The combination of fatty acids used by the python to accomplish its own, healthy enlargement
seems to have the same
effect in lab mice, and now researchers hope to apply the same principle to the treatment of
human heart problems.
Wolves, who rarely engage
in eye contact with their
human handlers,
seem resistant to this
effect.
These two findings were enough to propel HCA
in the mainstream fitness world, but it
seems its fame has quickly faded away after a study that was published
in the Journal of the American Medical Association
in 1998 said that HCA had no
effect whatsoever on
human participants.
The source cited
in this video
seems to be outdated: Recently the USDA's Nutrient Data Laboratory (NDL) removed the USDA ORAC Database for Selected Foods from the NDL website due to mounting evidence that the values indicating antioxidant capacity have no relevance to the
effects of specific bioactive compounds, including polyphenols on
human health http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docid=15866&pf=1
Changes
in leptin levels,
in fact, don't
seem to have any
effect on resting metabolic rates
in humans [Rosenbaum M, 1997; 2002].
We have no way of knowing what kinds of long term
effects they will produce
in humans, but they certainly
seem to have negative
effects on animals based on some studies.
Autoimmunity (where it genuinely exists — chronic infections are often misdiagnosed as autoimmune conditions even where no autoimmunity is present)
seems to be mainly a side
effect of chronic infections — collateral damage
in a guerilla war with pathogens that conceal themselves behind
human «cellular shields.»
Given the vast scale the Russos are working on, resorting to your typical collect - the - gems plot game
seems disappointingly basic, but there's a thornier problem with Thanos
in general: he's a huge hulk of a being, twice
human size, but the
effects job on Brolin thwarts his usual authority as an actor.
These compounds
seem to have a positive
effect on general health, intestinal function and flora and the prevention of colon cancer
in humans.
Dogs do not
seem to suffer the side
effects of chemotherapy
in the same way that
humans do; the side
effects do not
seem to be as severe or as prolonged.
However, there
seem to be a lot of plot - holes - the
humans seem unable to communicate with the robot, a mysterious entity who sends messages through self - destructing satellites never has their identity revealed (although you can make an educated guess), and one of the endings leaves the player,
in effect, stuck at the end of the universe with no answers.
Sure, to say the pixellated characters
in front and the flat images
in the back have aged badly is easy now, but back
in early 1993, the zenith of polygon - based 3D had been Alone
in the Dark and Virtua Racing, and with its fast - scaling action, weather and special move
effects, Dark Edge must have
seemed like a true alternative to the slow, chiseled and awkwardly animated
human characters
in those games.
The
effect, while bereft of aroma and
human interaction, reduces picture after picture to pictorial trope, or sign,
in an experience that
seems infinitely repeatable (bookmarkable).
Frederick vom Saal, a reproductive toxicologist at the University of Missouri - Columbia, countered by claiming: «There is essentially no difference
in the way that rat or mouse cells respond to BPA and the way that
humans respond to it,» adding that while the amount
in humans «may
seem like an incredibly small amount, it causes
effects in human cells at the part - per - trillion level.»
Anyway, the point I was making
seems to have been missed
in post # 28, namely (and simply) that significant climate changes can have adverse
effects on
human populations.
Crocs illuminate a particular point — that temperature changes, which
seem minor
in terms of
human comfort, can have significant
effects.
So yes,
Human emissions might be a player in this, but since it takes higher and higher temperature to make the same CO2 rise / year, we can indeed conclude, that other long term effects seems stronger than the human emissions and with opposite ef
Human emissions might be a player
in this, but since it takes higher and higher temperature to make the same CO2 rise / year, we can indeed conclude, that other long term
effects seems stronger than the
human emissions and with opposite ef
human emissions and with opposite
effect.
If we look at the trends since records began, noting that there are longitudinal problems (changes
in locations of weather stations, + UHI
effects) and contamination by
human analysts (data trickery), the trends
seem cyclical
in periods of around 60 years.
It
seemed that an understanding of the late Eemian climate events might be helpful
in assessing the climate
effects of
human - made global warming, as Earth is now approaching the warmth that existed then.
> 95 % probability 1 (GH
effect), 2 (CO2 is a GHG): OK 3 (Atmospheric CO2 is increasing): OK (but would like to see specific references of «hundreds») 4 (
Human CO2 emissions are increasing): OK 5 (
Human CO2 causes majority of CO2 increase):
Seems logical, but isotope studies are not conclusive; annual changes
in concentration do not correlated with annual CO2 emissions at all, so something else is also
in play here.
The bigger issue is that it is robustly unprovable or logical that so many negative
effects will happen because of a change
in temperature of even 2,3,4 degrees because as temperature has risen
human life and other life
seems to benefit from warmer climate.
In many cases, the importance of climate - change
effects on
human systems
seems to depend on the geographic (or sectoral) scale of attention (Abler, 2003; Wilbanks, 2003a).
Bookeh
effect seems to be
in action, and that too without any
human face there
in photo?
It
seems that
in this case, consistent with other primate and
human studies, the 5 - HTTLPR l / l genotype has a protective
effect in the face of parenting risk.