Not exact matches
«The problem with [the skeptics»] argument is that it's as if you can cherry - pick the CO2
fertilization effect from the overall
effect of adding
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere,» Myers says.
Results showed that
carbon dioxide fertilization explains 70 percent
of the greening
effect, said co-author Ranga Myneni, a professor in the Department
of Earth and Environment at Boston University.
However,
carbon dioxide fertilization isn't the only cause
of increased plant growth — nitrogen, land cover change and climate change by way
of global temperature, precipitation and sunlight changes all contribute to the greening
effect.
At the scale
of a leaf, the
carbon dioxide fertilization effect is well - documented.
Now, a study
of arid regions around the globe finds that a
carbon dioxide «
fertilization effect» has, indeed, caused a gradual greening from 1982 to 2010.
Model projections suggest that although increased temperature and decreased soil moisture will act to reduce global crop yields by 2050, the direct
fertilization effect of rising
carbon dioxide concentration -LRB-[CO2]-RRB- will offset these losses.
That seems to be subtly different from a direct «CO2
fertilization»
effect, where
carbon dioxide is simply the limiting factor to growth because there's not enough
of it.
And as to his claim that there may be «places around the world where global warming will lead to less crop success and yield, even when taking into account the
carbon dioxide fertilization effect,» he appears to be equally ignorant that rising levels
of atmospheric CO2 tend to raise the temperature
of optimum plant photosynthesis beyond the predicted temperature values associated with global warming, effectively nullifying this worn out claim (Idso & Idso, 2011).
These facts help explain why, in spite
of the Earth's air temperature increasing to a level that the IPCC claims is unprecedented in the the past millennium or more, a recent study by Randall et al. (2013) found that the 14 % extra
carbon dioxide fertilization caused by human emissions between 1982 and 2010 caused an average worldwide increase in vegetation foliage by 11 % after adjusting the data for precipitation
effects.
Dr. Myneni reckons that it is now possible to distinguish between these two
effects in the satellite data, and he concludes that 50 % is due to «relaxation
of climate constraints,» i.e., warming or rainfall, and roughly 50 % is due to
carbon dioxide fertilization itself.
U.S. Department
of Agriculture data tables provide evidence for the importance
of the eight Midwest states for U.S. agricultural production.3 Evidence for the
effect of future elevated
carbon dioxide concentrations on crop yields is based on scores
of greenhouse and field experiments that show a strong
fertilization response for C3 plants such as soybeans and wheat and a positive but not as strong a response for C4 plants such as corn.
This result sheds new light on the
effect of long - term
fertilization by iron and macronutrients on
carbon sequestration, suggesting that changes in iron supply from belowâ as invoked in some palaeoclimatic and future climate change scenarios11â may have a more significant
effect on atmospheric
carbon dioxide concentrations than previously thought.
The study suggests this so - called «CO2
fertilization effect» may also contribute to a stabilizing feedback in the climate system as increased biomass production and organic deposition in marshes sequester larger amounts
of carbon dioxide.
«While the
effect of direct
carbon dioxide fertilization has so far been neglected in marsh modeling, our research shows it is central in determining possible marsh survival under the foreseeable range
of climatic changes,» Marani said.
Obermeier et al. (2017) find that the
fertilization effect of increased
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere on C3 grasslands is reduced when conditions are wetter, dryer or hotter than the conditions to which the grasses are adapted.