Added methane reduces heat radiation to space, amplifying the warming
effect of carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels.
Not exact matches
Research at the Rodale Institute found that «organic farming helps combat global warming by capturing atmospheric
carbon dioxide and incorporating it into the soil, whereas conventional farming exacerbates the greenhouse
effect by
producing a net release
of carbon into the atmosphere.»
First, volcanic eruptions
produce major quantities
of carbon dioxide (CO2), a gas known to contribute to the greenhouse
effect.
It's not clear how much
of a greenhouse
effect that would
produce, but it's a good bet that Earth would be a lot warmer — much as it would be, say, if there were no plants drawing
carbon dioxide out
of the atmosphere.
The early presence
of plants and fungi on land would have reduced the amount
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,
producing a cooling
effect, the authors note.
A new study in Canada has found that some hydroelectric reservoirs give off as much
carbon dioxide and methane — the two most important causes
of the man - made greenhouse
effect — as coal - fired power stations
producing a similar amount
of electricity.
The oceans have absorbed approximately one third
of human -
produced CO2 emissions, dampening the
effects of carbon dioxide - driven greenhouse warming.
The discovery team presumes that VP113 has an icy reflective surface like other relatively small, outer Solar System objects, as the dwarf planet is observed to have a pink tinge, which is hypothesized to result from chemical changes
produced by the
effect of radiation on frozen water, methane, and
carbon dioxide.
No matter what other factors affect temperature, the addition
of large amounts
of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere - ocean system will
produce large negative
effects.
Data from satellite observations «suggest that greenhouse models ignore negative feedback
produced by clouds and by water vapor, that diminish the warming
effects»
of human
carbon dioxide emissions.
Unfortunately, RECs are almost entirely non-additional (e.g. the wind turbines
producing them in Iowa would have been built independent
of the REC income stream), so buying RECs has no real
effect on
carbon dioxide emissions.
Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric
carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
effects upon the natural plant and animal environments
of the Earth.
Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric
carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
effects upon the natural plant and animal environments
of the earth.»
On the contrary, the petition cites «substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric
carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
effects upon the natural plant and animal environments
of the earth.»
In fact, that all things green love
carbon -
dioxide rich environments is the ONLY thing we KNOW about the
effects of increase CO2 levels, other than the fact that higher and higher levels
of CO2
produce increasingly lesser and lesser amounts
of heating due to the «greenhouse
effect».
1 - A review
of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences
of increased levels
of atmospheric
carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and early 21st centuries have
produced no deleterious
effects upon Earth's weather and climate.
Atmospheric
carbon dioxide build up
produces a greenhouse
effect that re-radiates some
of the thermal wave lengths from the Earth's surface, which would otherwise escape into space, back towards the surface and the lower atmosphere leading to the increase in average surface temperatures.
The enhanced Greenhouse
Effect we are now measuring is a human fingerprint because the source
of it is the continued emission
of greenhouse gases, primarily
carbon dioxide,
produced by industrial activity.
Around 1850, physicist John Tyndall discovered that
carbon dioxide traps heat in our atmosphere,
producing the greenhouse
effect, which enables all
of creation as we know it to live on Earth.
A review
of research literature concerning the environmental consequences
of increased levels
of atmospheric
carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and 21st centuries have
produced no deleterious
effects on Earth's weather or climate.
Human exposure to fine particulate matter increases the risk
of acute lower respiratory infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, stroke and lung cancer, while exposure to
carbon dioxide — a colorless, odorless, non-toxic gas —
produces none
of these
effects and is in fact essential for life on earth.
Most
of your readers are probably unaware
of the fact that doubling
carbon dioxide in itself only
produces a modest warming
effect of about 1.2 C and that to get dangerous warming requires feedbacks from water vapour, clouds and other phenomena for which the evidence is far more doubtful.
However, the low value
of these catalysts
produces generally low reduction
effects of carbon dioxide.
«Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric
carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
effects upon the natural plan and animal environments
of the Earth.»
With all
of the negative
effects predicted to occur in response to the ongoing rise in the air's
carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration — a result
of burning fossil fuels to
produce energy — it is only natural to want to see what has been happening to our Earth's many ecosystems as the atmospheric
carbon dioxide load has risen.
Satellite observations suggest that GH models ignore negative feedbacks,
produced by clouds and by water vapor, that diminish the warming
effects of carbon dioxide.»
For millions
of years
carbon dioxide, from the earth's natural
carbon cycle, has worked to
produce the greenhouse
effect in the earth's atmosphere.
The petition further stated that «there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric
carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
effects upon the natural plant and animal environments
of the Earth.»
Burning forests emit massive amounts
of carbon dioxide,
producing a deeper greenhouse
effect.
Regardless, climate models are made interesting by the inclusion
of «positive feedbacks» (multiplier
effects) so that a small temperature increment expected from increasing atmospheric
carbon dioxide invokes large increases in water vapor, which seem to
produce exponential rather than logarithmic temperature response in the models.