Sentences with phrase «effect of every intervention within»

Not exact matches

What would a day be in the Divine circadian cycle of an omnimodal, omnipotent being, 24 hours, 24 billion years, 24 milliseconds??? Nowhere in the Bible coes it say that evolution does not exist within the living realm, but Simon Peter does say that to the I Am»... one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years is as one day...» (the Bible DOES recognize the effects of animal husbandry, which is a form of artificially - induced evolution on livestock species, and narrates accounts of Divine intervention to influence it, so you can not factually say that it is outside the realm of Divine probability by biblical accounts, as Divine probability contains, by textbook definition, the sum of the laws of nature.

For cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at up to six months face - to - face interventions may be associated with greater effects than other types of support; however, very high within - group heterogeneity remains in the analysis, and we advise caution when interpreting this result (test for subgroup differences: Chi ² = 37.55, df = 2 (P <.00001, I ² = 94.7 %; Analysis 3.2).

The first major trial assessing the effect on fertility of lifestyle adjustment in obese women was published earlier this year and found that a weight - loss intervention preceding fertility treatment did not result in higher rates of healthy singleton birth within 24 months.

It appears to take intensive efforts over a period of several years to produce lasting effects, but the fact that even the least intensive models of early intervention produce strong immediate effects suggests that a combination of approaches within a comprehensive preventive program will have great promise in increasing children's cognitive functioning and reducing future dropout.

In the context of 2016, (Re) Public celebrates the self - determination and agency of the country while tackling contemporary issues in Ireland which have broader resonance globally, these include: — hidden histories of state institutional abuse (Nolan) community identity in post conflict rural border regions (North 55), issues relating to natural cycles in time, climate change and its global effects (Softday), the individual's struggle for autonomy within the field of mental health (Tighe), the importance of creative autonomy and independence for the right to self - expression in movement and dance (Donnellan) and strategies of resistance that include artistic intervention, self - organization, and collectivism (Morley).

Subgroup analyses: We will examine whether there is evidence that the intervention effect is modified for subgroups within the trial participants using tests of interaction between intervention and child and family factors as follows: parity (first - born vs other), antenatal risks (2 vs 3 or more risk factors at screening), maternal mental health at baseline (high vs low score) 18, 62, 63 and self - efficacy at baseline (poor vs normal mastery) 35 using the regression models described above with additional terms for interaction between subgroup and trial arm.

Assuming a drop - out rate from the trial of approximately 20 %; this sample size was sufficient to detect a standardised effect size of 0.4 at 85 % power and α of 0.05 in the primary outcome measure if there was no clustering and a standardised effect size of 0.6 allowing for clustering by course with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.178 or less; for this sample size calculation, we conservatively imagined clustering within control families as well as intervention families.

Therefore, it seems reasonable that the parent — child relationship and maternal sensitivity can be improved within a relatively short time period, whereas the effects of the interventions on child development may take longer to emerge.63

However, in Healthy Families Alaska, program children had higher Bayley scores at age two than controls, with 58 percent of intervention children and 48 percent of controls scoring in the normal range.101 In the Nurse - Family Partnership evaluations, some effects were observed within each of the three evaluations, but most effects were concentrated within specific subgroups of families.

For patients with suspected infection within the ICU, the SOFA score had predictive validity (AUROC = 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.73 - 0.76) superior to that of this model (AUROC = 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.64 - 0.68), likely reflecting the modifying effects of interventions (eg, vasopressors, sedative agents, mechanical ventilation).

To examine intervention effects on change in cortisol values at home, an additional 4 - level, within - subject factor was included to represent time of day.

Post hoc analyses of change within groups indicated that there was an effect of time within the intervention group, reflecting an increase in prechallenge cortisol levels over time (t46 = 2.53, P =.02); no such effect was found in controls.

Although treatment effects for several outcomes were small in magnitude, as reported previously, HS was modest in intensity and cost, relative to other early intervention efforts.5 For example, HS families made 11 well - child visits and received < 2 home visits within their child's first 2.5 years, at a cost of $ 402 to $ 933 / year.

To estimate effect sizes, Cohen d was computed by dividing the unstandardized coefficients for intervention effects (accounting for level 1 and level 2 covariates) by the within - group standard deviation.40, 41 Estimates of within - group standard deviation were computed using the raw data for waking cortisol level (to examine the intervention effect on the intercept) and raw data for waking to bedtime change in cortisol level (to examine the intervention effect on the slope).

This additional work and the reprioritization of efforts should reflect pediatricians» interest in preventive care that is more developmentally relevant, 32 parents» desire for a greater emphasis on their child's emerging skills and behavior, 33 the commitment to team - based services within the pediatric medical home, 28 and the growing evidence base that early developmental interventions can have significant effects on life - course trajectories.34

A two - level hierarchical linear model consisting of repeated observations within individuals and individuals assigned to conditions was used to evaluate the effects of time from baseline to post-intervention comparing the three conditions and from post-intervention to eight - month follow - up for both intervention conditions.

Linear mixed - methods models were used to examine the effect of the intervention on each outcome and accounted for nesting of the intervention effects within the four follow - up time periods (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months).

These cases illustrate what was discussed in the previous chapters and allow the reader to observe the theoretical concepts put into clinical practice — giving the history and background of the clients, actual EMDR sessions, attachment - repair interventions within these sessions and the rationale for them, and information about the effects of the interventions and the course of treatment.

Intervention effects will be assessed by conducting linear and logistic random effects models incorporating a time by group interaction or latent growth curve modelling to determine whether trends across the three data points within the course of the patients» treatment differ between the carer groups.39 The models will adjust for confounders and effect modifiers as necessary.

For example, interventions that have successfully increased condom use in adolescents8, 9 or reduced early initiation of sex36 have been found to lose their effect within 1 year.

This format can be particularly useful in capturing broader intervention effects not contained within the psychometric properties of the PedsQL or SDQ.

In contrast, a more intensive model, in which all components of treatment are implemented and mastered within a shorter time frame, may serve to reduce functional impairment (e.g., child's behavioral difficulties at school) more quickly, enhance family motivation in a more focused treatment period, thereby increasing participant engagement and perhaps increasing the effect of the intervention (Foa and Steketee 1987).