While
imposing no effective measures to
cut our emissions now, the Government has put its faith in the development
of «clean coal» technologies and nuclear power, the most important features
of which are that neither would have a significant
effect on our greenhouse emissions for at least 15 - 20 years.
wouldn't tell the public that the problem is not the Law Society's problem, as in
effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact upon the problem, and several other developed support services, all provided at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to solve the problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other law societies to solve this national problem; (18) the Federation
of Law Societies
of Canada would not describe the problem as being one
of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory
of Access to Legal Services Initiatives
of the Law Societies
of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «
cutting costs by
cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to
impose an Ontario version
of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorities.