Sentences with phrase «effect seems logical»

Just because a market effect seems logical doesn't mean the phenomenon presents itself predictably in the market.

Since vitamin C is consumed at high rates during some surgeries, this effect seems logical, and certain patients may be very low in vitamin C before surgery and hence really need a vitamin C boost.

Not exact matches

One major reform that Hegel seems to have taken upon himself to effect is the production of a logical hierarchy of being that in a sense reverses the direction of abstraction of the Aristotelian logical hierarchy, i.e., that becomes more differentiated and «concrete» as it rises in generality and inclusiveness, rather than more empty and abstract.

Seems logical enough that those high - carbohydrate foods might have a similar effect on us.

Treating the cause not so much the effect seemed rather logical.

It therefore seems logical that we should emulate the effect inside the built environment.

It should seem logical to emphasize — through larger text or some text effects — a few key words in the title, which relate to the text.

It seems logical that it might help the kidneys to feed lower amounts of higher quality protein throughout life but there really isn't much evidence to support a beneficial effect except in dogs who actually have kidney insufficiency.

«A logical system of European alliances made all the sense in the world until the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, and then everything seemed to have a domino effect,» says Naumann, referring to the event that triggered World War I.

** This seems like a totally logical way to show the warming effect from CO2, but the IPCC always insists on showing just warming over time.

> 95 % probability 1 (GH effect), 2 (CO2 is a GHG): OK 3 (Atmospheric CO2 is increasing): OK (but would like to see specific references of «hundreds») 4 (Human CO2 emissions are increasing): OK 5 (Human CO2 causes majority of CO2 increase): Seems logical, but isotope studies are not conclusive; annual changes in concentration do not correlated with annual CO2 emissions at all, so something else is also in play here.

The bigger issue is that it is robustly unprovable or logical that so many negative effects will happen because of a change in temperature of even 2,3,4 degrees because as temperature has risen human life and other life seems to benefit from warmer climate.

In economic theory there are (were) plenty of models that seemed logical, coherent and broadly in line with both observations and established micro-results (this echoes the «but the effect is physical and the Earth is warming!»

This seems logical as after the delivery of the Taricco I judgment, anyone should be able to reasonably predict the effects of Article 325 TFEU (ignorantia iuris nocet).

It basically seems like the next logical step once you've masked off the background and applied a lens blur — you apply a lighting effect to your subject's face.