The two are inextricably linked, but technology has the greater power to
effect social change because we have essentially no societal mechanisms in place to refuse new technologies.
Not exact matches
Because of the complex interaction of religious broadcasting with other
social characteristics such as broader religious and cultural movements,
changing social uses of mass media, and
changing historical circumstances, it is unlikely that a simple cause -
effect relationship between the viewing of religious programs on television and individual faith and church interaction could ever be isolated.
I nevertheless thank Karen Mapp
because I know that her request for me to «dig deep» had an immediate
effect on how I navigate the work of
social change.
CHICAGO — Possible
changes to Medicare and
Social Security have become the top political concern for older U.S. voters this year — and not just
because of the
effect on their own pocketbooks.
* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate
change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate
change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate
change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate
change, we will be able to cope with them * The
effects of climate
change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate
change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate
change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change
The
social foundations of children's mental and physical health and well - being are threatened by climate
change because of:
effects of sea level rise and decreased biologic diversity on the economic viability of agriculture, tourism, and indigenous communities; water scarcity and famine; mass migrations; decreased global stability46; and potentially increased violent conflict.47 These
effects will likely be greatest for communities already experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.48
But it was cold this winter and C02 is plant food and only a trace gas and the greenhouse
effect has been disproved anyway and even if the greenhouse
effect does exist, C02 has negligible impact compared to water vapour and our only source of heat is the sun so it must be the sun, unless it is due to the C02 from volcanoes, but C02 follows warming so it can't be the C02 and the medieval warm period was warmer anyway and all the temperature reconstructions that show this not to be true are produced by corrupt scientists being paid by corrupt governments that have colluded to create an excuse to form a one world unelected
social - ist government and even if the scientists are not that corrupt, although the e-mails prove they are, they have still got it wrong as the climate sensitivity is not as high as they think it is
because it is basically the planets orbits and cosmic rays so we can say for a fact that the warming that probably does not exist is definatley not due to humans and even if it was the evidence is not sufficient to make drastic
changes to the economy and increase taxes so that the politicians and scientists and business leaders get rich and leave us all poor — do they think we are stupid or something?
What I mean by this question is that climate
change poses a real challenge to
social change movements
because it is gradual, delayed in its
effects, and uneven in its impacts.The message that is coming from climate scientists at present, along with climate - hawkish public figures, is that we still have time to
change — that international conferences, evolving public policies, steady but small annual emissions reductions, could still prove sufficient to keep us within the «safe zone».