None of those is a certain path to success, but most
effective charter schools seem to share similar characteristics, according to Patsy O'Neill, executive director of the Charter School Resource Center of Texas.
Not exact matches
For example, Rothstein contends that KIPP (Knowledge Is Power Program), a network of
charter schools that have produced impressive results with disadvantaged students, isn't as
effective as it
seems.
In particular, urban
charter schools seem to be much more
effective than non-urban
charter schools.
In short, the takeaway from the
charter literature
seems to be that they are, on average, more
effective than traditional public
schools in urban settings and perhaps should be encouraged there, but that authorizers and policy contexts matter tremendously in determining whether these
schools succeed or not.
I'm not sure I can prove it with hard data, but it sure
seems clear to me that the cities and states with some of the highest - performing
charter schools (Boston, Washington, D.C., New York State, Tennessee) are also home to some of the most thoughtful and
effective authorizers.
«Although the
school closures and other reforms were wrenching for many communities in Newark, the subsequent movement of students into more
effective district and
charter schools seems to be paying off for children.»
The
charter school sector, in many states, has produced worthwhile education innovations and gains, Fuller points out, and virtual
charters would
seem to offer a cost -
effective, alternative for struggling students.