That ruins the entire thing, and I am sold on Miskolczi's paper that because of the conservation of energy, Eu at the top of the troposphere must be 1/2 of Su or hydrostatic stabilty will be affected and lower
the effective emission height of the troposphere from convective overturn and release latent heat and clouds which have the same effect.
Not exact matches
This
effective emission temperature of -19» C corresponds in mid-latitudes with a
height of approximately 5 km.
The evidence of the size of climate zone shifts and the associated changes in atmospheric
heights from Mediaeval Warm Period to Little Ice Age to date suggests that the natural solar and ocean induced changes in the
effective radiating
height are far greater than anything that could be achieved by human
emissions.
The surface temperature is the
effective radiative temperature -LRB--18 C) plus the average
height of
emission (5.5 km) times the (moist) adiabatic lapse rate (6 C / km).
The recently used
emission scenarios take into account
effective injection
heights and their regional and seasonal variability (e.g., Dentener et al., 2006).