The US has long relied on the doctrine of «mutually assured destruction» — that is, having a spread - out, autonomous, and
effective nuclear arsenal that would return fire should another nuclear power attack — with the intent of deterring any nuclear attacks.
Not exact matches
«While almost two years in the making, this new decrease in dangerous and costly
nuclear arsenals sets the stage for not only improved Russian - American relations, but also for much more
effective global nonproliferation policies.»
js4tx:: what would our
nuclear arsenal be worth if Russia managed to deploy an
effective missile defense system?
Turn this around and think... what would our
nuclear arsenal be worth if Russia managed to deploy an
effective missile defense system?