Sentences with phrase «effective playing as»

With some fine tuning, there is no reason why he can't be effective playing as a No. 10.

Not exact matches

My client's situation highlights a truth that I've seen play out over and over again as I coach business leaders to be better speakers and more effective communicators: Speaking is what I like to call a signal skill.

Granted, the third - place team probably dropped more games than we did because playing as an effective team in consecutive games is harder to do.

If the president gets the results he's looking for (whatever they may be) and Beijing is perceived as having played an important role in reaching that outcome, that could give Trump the cover he probably needs to put his pistols back in their holsters and focus on an effective, comprehensive U.S. - China free trade agreement.

As a time coach and trainer, and author of The 3 Secrets to Effective Time Investment, I'm acutely aware that addressing underlying emotional issues plays a foundational role in shifting people's habits.

Should any weight be given to the possibility that the wife (or husband, for that matter) could be freed by effective birth control to achieve other basic goods, such as knowledge or skill at play?

It is only as theology and as the church can communicate to men a message that is relevant to their felt needs, frustrations, fears, hopes, and dreams that each can play an effective role in the present crisis.

He played his cards as a realistic and effective politician, and won.

In England, the dioceses of Lancaster and Shrewsbury have made particularly effective use of the internet in pushing out good news and keeping up with the way in whichpeople choose to receive information, but in some dioceses there is often still an attitude in which people see the internet as irrelevant, looking down on what they see as technically advanced enthusiasts who spend too much time «playing on their computers».

Flamini / arteta 6.73 with flamini playing x2 more games this suggest he isn't as effective as arteta so flamini time should come to an end.

Cazorla is being played out of position, that's why he's not as effective, but he had a bad game today regardless of position.

Big teams make the tough decision and drop the player who does not play and play the player that is most deserving, who is most effective and in the best condition, as well as being influential to the team dynamics.

Don't quote squawka stats... Ramsey hardly plays in that role... but that isn't to say he couldn't be as effective or better there.

Everyone on the team are mentally together and play as one highly effective unit.

Yes we have players that can play Ozil's role but they will be much less effective than Ozil and the team as a whole will be severely weakened IMO.

He would be really effective playing the Plumlee role in Portland's small lineup as he'd have space for days.

if you watch the games where we played with jack and ramsey in the 4 -3-3 you could see ramsey was the furthest up the pitch, ramsey would almost at like a cf and to me thats why he wasn't as effective.

I knew aubameyang would not be as effective here at arsenal because of our style of play, our football is pathetic, lack of vertical penetration, lack of proper wingers to offer width and one on one dribbling or crosses from the by - line, lack of a proper defensive midfielder, zonal marking on corners instead of man marking, i can go on but we all know our weaknesses.

Theo is fine as a CF.. He has been playing on the left and I think we can all say that Theo is not as effective on the left compared to the right or as a CF.. It will be good to leave Theo to focus solely on the CF role as it will give Giroud a tougher competition for the starting spot and that will only benefit us fans when we have 2 different style CF to fcuk over opponents with We have a Plan B with Theo and I think that is very important.

It's a pretty big deal that he was able to play in the Super Bowl and look as effective as he did.

Nasri played there and was successful and effective I think Mr wenger is trying to mold him that way Football is a game and can be manipulated in many ways one being 442 perhaps he is better suited in that formation in the right midfield but not as a winger so maybe he should share carzolas job I do nt know I am not MR Wnger and I have not been out to a training session to judge

Given Juan Mata's presence in the squad, it remains to be seen who gets the nod out of the duo as the Spaniard has been more effective when played centrally too.

It's also great that he's content with playing as either a striker or a winger, but in my opinion, with Iwobi and Walcott proving effective so far this season, why would it be right for one of them to be dropped so Alexis can move back out wide for the French forward to regain his place upfront.

David Moyes is keen to bring in other effective striking options to play alongside the Croatian or to act as back - up and sees Holt as a cost effective option in this regard.

Of course he's proven effective with his goal tally, but with Giroud not getting as involved in the build up play (based on the amount of touches he gets) suggests to me that a lot of the time, the striker position is being wasted in front of goal.

Our defence takes holidays every 5 minutes and, our attack play can be as effective as a glass hammer sometimes!

B.) When there is questionable delivery and 50/50 chances applying a strong body to an opposing player taking them out of play or the ability to reach balls a foot higher in the air is just as effective as a tight turn or burning your man.

In contrast, Mourinho simply isn't using the former Juventus man in his most effective role, on the left of a midfield three, as we saw him flourish in Turin playing that position.

Possible rotations which wouldn't weaken the team significantly... Gab for Per Debuchy for Hector (if Debuchy is alright) Gibbs for Monreal Theo for Rambo (Theo can play as a true RW with Debuchy being restraint in his forward runs) Jack for Santi (Jack to do the Deep Lying role) Welbz for Sanchez (stick to the right... will support Gibbs on his forward runs) Rosicky for Ozil (TR7 is still an effective creator and adds bite to the midfield)

play Chambers in DM, sit back as a 1/2 centre back along with mertesacker and Koscielny, then the midfield harass would've been less effective, and there can be a bit more steel.

Giroud forgets that his role as a striker is to score goals.His hold up play is excellent, but a striker should be concentrating on scoring.He needs to change his game so he can loose his marker and play a more effective role for the team.

He has blown me away completely — knew he was sublime technically but watch him closely and have a peep at his stats and you will see he is almost as effective in breaking up play as he is in going forward.

Chelsea alternate between a 4 33 and a 4 2 31, both equally as effective, Ramires can play in the pivot, as a RM and on the wing and has done so for the last 2 season's giving Chelsea something different if Fabregas does not play or should they desire a direct approach, Azpilicueta who is probably the league's best LB is not even a LB, Ivanovic is not a RB but a CB by trade, Fabregas has and does play no. 10 on occasions for Chelsea, should any of these players get injured they have a world class replacement waiting, the same can not be said of Arsenal, we play one way and our subs are usually like for like or like for out of position.

Hes a jedi but i agree we need cazorla back or player like him or rosicky or song and coquin wasnt song who can still play with the passing of the other players in the team xhaka is usually good on ball but so bad off of it hes been a bust so far we almost need the french connection again they have quality players we could use but honestly i think auba will be more effective on flank pnce we get laca back it takes alot of strength to play up front in the premier league it takes two years to rebuild in pl at least bit we have had two rough years and not nearly as rough as chelseas or man u or Liverpool or well this is as big as totteham will be before we make them drop down again and oh do nt forget man city either lets remember our history

City has been quite effective playing Jesus and Aguero as double strikers in a two - upfront formation.

Until we get a new striker such as Lewy / Kane or someone who can play as a false 9 we wouldnt know how effective it will be..

Arsenal can do without him as they have many options they are deploying and can deploy effective in the central midfield and the wide area roles he plays in.

And to be fair to the midfielder, I would be over the moon to have the Ramsey of a few years ago back, but the problem is that we have seen that effective and dynamic input from Ramsey all too rarely, especially in an Arsenal shirt as he does seem to play better for Wales than he does for us.

The screen game should still be strong and if Cook / Murray can be as effective as Murray / Jet (which they should be) then play - action will be even more dangerous than it was in 2017.

Nice to say our wise and great leader writer but whether it translates on the pitch is another matter altogether.The problems in arsenal honestly is more than 2 signings however those two signings are coming to the position where we need them the most so we will take it so.But is he really going to do that as from his actions it implies we do not need a new dmf but for a striker i think it crosses his mind at times.He just needs to do the right its like he has lost control or something.I just do not get him again.Imagine dropping Ox who is currently our most effective and best player right now as he is in form.Then he puts Gabriel on the bench for who.He is kidding.He then keeps players who should be released or sold and plays them.This is nonsense.

You got ta play players where they are most effective and where the team will be most effective as a result.

The 27 - year - old Spaniard has an arsenal of very effective wing - play which includes great pace on the ball, pinpoint crossing, good physical strength and lethal finishing as well.

-- we don't play attractive football - we don't play effective football — highest ticket prices — wenger says top 4 is a trophy — our best player will leave — Wenger has lost the dressing room — our owner and board are USELESS so tell me, WHY DO PEOPLE ACCEPT THIS!!!! I'm putting some of the blame on the Wenger ins as well, they let them get away with it.

And you can not play Fabregas as winger or striker (out of position) and then criticizing him for less effective.

Giroud always does well as a sub, but he doesn't seem to be half as hungry or effective when he starts a game, and so it proved again last night, as he doesn't play so well as a lone striker.

It beats my understanding how people complain and rate a guy who hardly gets game time... while they praise others who r failing» high flying» that guy has missed many one on ones this season and chamberlain offers nothing except running with and finally loosing the ball on the other hand Campbel for the few games he played was effective defending and not bad atttacking remember he always come on as a sub considering all that pressure l

We believe live performance is the most fun and effective way to teach an instrument, which is why we get kids playing on stage as quickly as possible.

The problem for Ozil and Ozil lovers is that Sanchez can play No 10 and just be as effective in an attacking sense.

Walcott though limited would be very confident against Man united Cech (No word he has shocked me, Wow this guy is too great for a team with wenger as coach) Bellerin (He really has to improve his attacking side nd try to take on defenders) Chambers (Hez really good against de big guns & always gud in de middle of de park) Kos (Hez been a bit de-moltivated due to wengers lack of ambition hope Man u will do) Mon (link - up with walcott on the left would be breath of fresh air) Coq (great tackler, stamina & power) Ramsey (great passer of de ball, professional & great stamina) Sanchez (on the right, so he won't always play predictably) Walcott (thats where he was effective the last time against man u) Welbeck (Pace, goals & trickery) Giroud (Power, bully, link - up & goals) 4 -4-2 formation

Rather, Pathways simply was suggesting alternate ways to incorporate guys like Vince, PJ, and Dakota who weren't nearly as consistently effective once teams decided to play Haas straight up, as well as incorporating Eastern as a mismatch for smaller guards.