ScholarCentric's middle and high school materials, technology, and services align well with i3 funding in the following categories: innovations that support
effective teachers and principals, improve the use of data, complement the implementation of high standards and assessments, and turn around low - performing schools.
We all need to work together so that 10 years from now, America's children will have the sort of federal education law they so richly deserve — one that challenges them to achieve to high standards, and provides them with the highly
effective teachers and principals who can prepare them for success in college and the workforce.
-- To boost the quality of teachers and principals, especially in high - poverty schools and hard - to - staff subjects, states and districts should be able to identify
effective teachers and principals — and have strategies for rewarding and retaining more top - notch teachers and improving or replacing ones who aren't up to the job.
It rewards highly
effective teachers and principals with additional compensation.
Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining
effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most.
The U.S. Department of Education has invited applications for the latest round of its Teacher Incentive Fund competition, which supports the development of performance - based compensation systems to place and keep
effective teachers and principals in high - need schools.
We are calling on states and districts to develop and implement systems of teacher and principal evaluation and support, and to identify effective and highly
effective teachers and principals on the basis of student growth and other factors.
The state will also develop reporting mechanisms to disseminate data on performance of LEAs and schools in developing more
effective teachers and principals (reflected in the percentage of teachers and principals moving up in the rating categories).
Priority placed on creating different levels of compensation for
effective teachers and principals.
Race to the Top encourages states to develop innovative ideas around several themes, including recruiting, evaluating and retaining
effective teachers and principals.
3) Alignment of districts systems for recruiting, developing, supporting, and retaining
effective teachers and principals — between districts.
Pay - for - performance compensation systems seek to improve educator quality and attract the most
effective teachers and principals to high - needs schools.
Twenty - eight percent of the points in the RTTT rubric centered on
effective teachers and principals; beyond that, other sections included requirements for identifying effective teacher preparation programs, effective instructional strategies, and effective schools, as identified by student - level data.
Both competitions will fund projects across five priority areas: supporting
effective teachers and principals; promoting science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education; helping implement rigorous academic content standards and high - quality assessments; turning around low - performing schools; and improving graduation rates in rural schools.
Race to the Top funding will be used across the four required areas — adopting standards and assessments to prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace, using data systems that measure student performance and assist educators in using data to make instructional decisions, ensuring
effective teachers and principals, and turning around the lowest performing schools.
Efforts to improve educator quality and to attract the most
effective teachers and principals to high - need schools have caused policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels to promote pay - for - performance plans.
«
Effective teachers and principals are so central to boosting student achievement and producing better outcomes for children,» Duncan said.
High schools are seeking to build systems that ensure success for every student; this is being further emphasized by the Obama administration, which has identified the following four Race to the Top priority areas in the Race to the Top Executive Summary (2009): «adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy; building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction; cultivating
effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; and turning around struggling schools» (p. 1).
Each of the applications will be subject to peer review in the context of five priority areas: supporting
effective teachers and principals; promoting science, technology, engineering and mathematics education; supporting the implementation of high academic content standards and high - quality assessments; turning around low - performing schools; and improving graduation rates in rural schools.
The program has funded 131 projects to improve pay structures, reward
effective teachers and principals and provide greater professional opportunities to educators in high poverty schools.
Create accountable management systems that use evaluation data to provide evidence that schools have
effective teachers and principals.
(i) Ensure the equitable distribution of teachers and principals by developing a plan, informed by reviews of prior actions and data, to ensure that students in high - poverty and / or high - minority schools (both as defined in this notice) have equitable access to highly
effective teachers and principals (both as defined in
Developing much more
effective teachers and principals must be a priority.
Initially funded at $ 650 million, i3 allowed school districts, charter schools, and non-profit organizations working in partnership with one of those entities to apply for grants to support innovative programs aligned with one of four broadly defined federal priorities (e.g., supporting
effective teachers and principals or improving the use of data).
Some perceived harms might be unavoidable, including closing schools, terminating the least
effective teachers and principals, or reducing central office employment and contracting.
That's why we need an education agenda that strategically recruits, retains, and rewards the most
effective teachers and principals; that builds incredibly high standards; that develops rigorous and useful assessments to measure progress against those standards; that builds data systems that allow teachers, principals, students, and parents to quickly and conveniently access those data for everyday use; and that focuses on dramatic intervention within our country's lowest - performing schools.
The new version of the law, he said, will need to ensure
effective teachers and principals for underperforming schools, expand learning time, and devise an accountability system that measures individual student progress and uses data to inform instruction and teacher evaluation.
The winning states are making dramatic changes in how they do business — adopting common standards and assessments, building data systems that measure student growth and success, retaining
effective teachers and principals, and turning around their lowest performing schools.
CEC supports the implementation of reliable and
effective teacher and principal evaluation, including Joint Committee support, Inter-Rater Reliability calibration, and feedback training.
Her expertise includes assessment design, coaching, Danielson's Framework for Teaching, the development of highly effective teams, the successful design and implementation of
effective teacher and principal evaluation plans, including the implementation of the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA).
Not exact matches
There will be two required observations, from a
teacher's
principal or administrator
and an «independent» evaluator, who could be a
principal, administrator or «highly
effective»
teacher from another school or district.
«When
principals and teachers share
effective strategies, it's the students who benefit,» said Fariña.
Nearly every school district in the state, with the notable exception of New York City, began evaluating
teachers and principals last year on a scale of «ineffective» to «highly
effective.»
Under the new rules,
teachers and principals will be rated as «highly
effective,» «
effective,» «developing,» or «ineffective.»
Preliminary data released in October 2013 showed that the vast majority of
teachers and principals (94 %
and 92 %, respectively) were deemed «
Effective» or «Highly
Effective» despite student proficiency rates around 30 % in math
and ELA.
Besides ensuring that all students have compassionate,
effective teachers creating classroom conditions
and opportunities for these things to occur, a school
principal's primary responsibility is to allocate the scarce resources of time, space,
and funding to maximize children's positive
and productive experiences of school.
When
Principals were asked about the preparedness of recent
teacher graduates, the areas they were most positive about included «Making
effective use of ICT»
and «Subject content knowledge», while areas for concern included «Supporting students with disabilities»
and «Teaching Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander students».
Meanwhile, it provides $ 2.5 billion to support professional development that can be used to «improve the knowledge of
teachers and principals and, in appropriate cases, paraprofessionals, concerning
effective instructional strategies, methods,
and skills,
and use of challenging State academic content standards
and student academic achievement standards,
and State assessments, to improve teaching practices
and student academic achievement.»
The new evaluation systems have forced
principals to prioritize classrooms over cafeterias
and custodians (
and have exposed how poorly prepared many
principals are to be instructional leaders)
and they have sparked conversations about
effective teaching that often simply didn't happen in the past in many schools — developments that
teachers say makes their work more appealing.
Almost every district has a few
effective schools, where
principals and teachers have forged rich educational experiences for children.
In previous research using the 2003
principal survey data (see «When
Principals Rate Teachers,» research, Spring 2006), we found that principals in the district are usually able to identify the most and least effective teachers in their schools, as measured by their students» academic
Principals Rate
Teachers,» research, Spring 2006), we found that principals in the district are usually able to identify the most and least effective teachers in their schools, as measured by their students» academic p
Teachers,» research, Spring 2006), we found that
principals in the district are usually able to identify the most and least effective teachers in their schools, as measured by their students» academic
principals in the district are usually able to identify the most
and least
effective teachers in their schools, as measured by their students» academic p
teachers in their schools, as measured by their students» academic progress.
As it compiles information on «
effective» leader
and teacher practices from its third cohort of low - income schools across the nation, the New York City - based New Leaders for New Schools
principal - training program is pushing to make the resulting resources more user - friendly.
Looking back, I can see that my colleagues
and I were struggling to counteract powerful tendencies that work against high student achievement in urban schools: If
teachers work in isolation, if there isn't
effective teamwork, if the curriculum is undefined
and weakly aligned with tests, if there are low expectations, if a negative culture prevails, if the
principal is constantly distracted by nonacademic matters, if the school does not measure
and analyze student outcomes,
and if the staff lacks a coherent overall improvement plan — then students fall further
and further behind,
and the achievement gap becomes a chasm.
A team of
teachers,
principals,
and researchers wrote this book based on their efforts to help schools in Pontiac, Mich., become more
effective...
Although better
principals may also attract
and hire more -
effective teachers, the absence of reliable quality measures for new
teachers and the fact that many
principals have little control over new hires lead us to focus specifically on turnover.
We need to address the shortage of
teachers and principals, respond to increases in student enrollment, to build safe
and modern schools, make
effective educational technology accessible to all students,
and prepare young people to compete internationally.
With detailed information on
teacher effectiveness
and transitions, we could investigate whether better
principals are more likely to dismiss the least -
effective teachers and reduce the likelihood that the more -
effective teachers depart voluntarily.
Brian Jacob
and Lars Lefgren find no relationship between
teachers» pay and their performance in a mid-sized, western school district (see «When Principals Rate Teachers,» research, page 58); and Eric Hanushek, Steven Rivkin, and Daniel O'Brien, in a 2005 working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, report no relationship between teacher productivity and changes in pay, suggesting that surrounding districts do not pull the most effective teachers from the city by offering higher s
teachers» pay
and their performance in a mid-sized, western school district (see «When
Principals Rate
Teachers,» research, page 58); and Eric Hanushek, Steven Rivkin, and Daniel O'Brien, in a 2005 working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, report no relationship between teacher productivity and changes in pay, suggesting that surrounding districts do not pull the most effective teachers from the city by offering higher s
Teachers,» research, page 58);
and Eric Hanushek, Steven Rivkin,
and Daniel O'Brien, in a 2005 working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, report no relationship between
teacher productivity
and changes in pay, suggesting that surrounding districts do not pull the most
effective teachers from the city by offering higher s
teachers from the city by offering higher salaries.
We find a positive correlation between a
principal's assessment of how
effective a
teacher is at raising student achievement
and that
teacher's success in doing so as measured by the value - added approach: 0.32 for reading
and 0.36 for math.
We expect highly rated
principals to be more successful both at retaining
effective teachers and at moving out less -
effective ones.