Not exact matches
Accountability
systems have worked well with other reforms — such as
effective choice policies, the expansion of early - childhood - education and other school - readiness programs, and efforts to improve the teaching force through evaluation and
tenure reform — to improve education for children around the country.
Such evaluation
systems are an essential precondition for
effective tenure reform, but have been missing from most past state
tenure reform proposals
Tying teacher
tenure to the new evaluation
system, with three «
effective» or two «highly
effective» ratings within the first five years leading to
tenure.
However, New York City revamped the
system in 2012 to make it more challenging for educators to receive
tenure, and this in turn has led less
effective teachers to voluntarily exit the school
system.
Under the new Louisiana law, teachers must be rated as «highly
effective» in the state's evaluation
system for five consecutive years before they can be granted
tenure.
Three widespread practices in particular are in need of major revision: teacher evaluation and
tenure systems that do not distinguish
effective teachers from ineffective ones; forced placement, where teachers are assigned to schools based on seniority rather than the match of teacher skills to school preferences and needs; and LIFO (last in first out), by which teacher lay - offs are based entirely on seniority rather than teacher effectiveness.
During his
tenure there, he implemented a balanced assessment
system, transitioned the state to 100 % online testing, implemented the West Virginia Growth Model, developed an approved growth - based accountability
system under ESEA Flexibility, and led standard settings to define statewide cut scores for
effective schools and teachers.
In response, they suggest that the heart of the issue is
effective teaching and substantiate the ways in which policymakers can address challenges to related to retention, the
tenure system, and the continuous development of the teacher workforce.