Sentences with phrase «effects of a bad economy»

This means that the security that was initially promised to you and your family may disappear within a year should yours state absorb the ripple effects of a bad economy with regard to budgetary spending.

Not exact matches

And while there are lots of high - income earners who will be affected, it has an unintended side effect that small - business owners (the restaurant owner, the bike shop repairman and the dry cleaning operator), who are considered the backbone of the economy, would likely have to pay higher taxes — and be worse off financially — as well.

(On the flip side, this situation leads to a special type of investment operation that actually causes people to seek out ownership of bad businesses when they think the economy is likely to recover given that they experience bigger upswings as the operating leverage effect happens in reverse.)

Which politicians wouldn't be interested in something UNICEF describe as «a natural safety net against the worst effects of poverty» or a factor shown to have a significant impact on the national economy?

He says «as Europe changes, of course there are opportunities... but the first priority is to make sure the eurozone crisis which is having such a bad effect on our economy is resolved».

Accordingly, they decisively favour a description of Plan A: «borrowing more will make matters worse... we have to bring the debt and the deficit under control even if it has some painful effects for the economy in the short term» over Plan B: «the government's spending cuts and tax rises are hurting the economy.

Thinking now about foreign stocks and mutual funds, which invest in companies that are based in foreign countries, when Americans invest in foreign stocks, do you think that is --[ROTATED: good for the U.S. economy, does not have much of an effect either way or is bad for the U.S. economy]?

A bad economy effects all of us... when prices go up, we all have to pay those higher prices.

As the environmental effects of global warming increase, the disruption to the economy will be far worse than that caused by banning the use of unnecessary transport.

To mitigate the worst effects of climate change we are required to decarbonize our economies while meeting the demands of global development.

The global financial system has gone through the worst crisis since the Great Depression, and the effects are only beginning to wind their way through every facet of the economy.

And some chemicals may have effects at diminishingly small levels: knowing which chemicals to worry about will help us to regulate the bad guys while keeping our economy and modern lifestyle, highly dependent upon the magic of chemicals, in good shape too.

If we take this path toward a clean energy future, we know we can stop the worst effects of global warming while reviving our economy, rescuing America from its dependence on fossil fuels, reducing pollution and threats to our health, protecting the natural resources that we depend upon for survival, and creating millions of good jobs right here at home.

That's having a very bad effect on our own economy, just from a job creation point of view, but also on our ability to do the physical testing and making that is critical when you're developing a new infrastructure.