Not exact matches
The findings back up a body
of data suggesting that «the
effects of global [
warming] will be seen first, and will be most pronounced, in the
arctic region,» says Mark Serreze, an
arctic climatologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado.
Noise pollution, for example, may adversely affect echolocating mammals, and the ongoing
effects of global
warming degrade
arctic environments.
black soot has also been found by a recent university
of california study to be the direct cause
of the albedo
warming effect on the otherwise highly reflective and pristine white
arctic ice & snow.
In fact, only
warming by an enhanced greenhouse
effect will
warm nights more than day, polar regions (and especially the
arctic *) more than tropical regions, and cool the stratosphere while
warming the troposphere — all
of which are features
of the current
warming.
with respect to the direct
effect of the sun on
arctic meltinc, i failed to mention that sunspot activity has been directly correlated to
warming and cooling trends over the course
of geohistory.
He says: «The
arctic council's recent report on the
effect of global
warming -LRB-...) ignored a tickling time bomb buried in the
Arctic -LRB-...).
Subject
of some specific concern about global
warming because
of large temperature rises predicted for the
arctic, and because
of some
arctic - specific feedback
effects (e.g. the albedo feedback following loss
of arctic sea ice).
Hansen got the
warming right in the 1980s, the hockey stick is validated by numerous oth alternative research methods and ocean heat content and
arctic ice continue to rise and shrink as predicted from the understanding
of the physical
effect of CO2, as have air temperatures in the area.
In Washington there was an awesome Earth Day warning from a government scientist, Dr. Jay Murray Mitchell said, «Pollution and over-pollution unless checked could so
warm the earth in 200 years as to create a greenhouse
effect melting the
arctic ice cap and flooding vast areas
of the world.»
The
warming effect of carbon dioxide is strongest where air is cold and dry, mainly in the
arctic rather than in the tropics, mainly in mountainous regions rather than in lowlands, mainly in winter rather than in summer, and mainly at night rather than in daytime.
It is arguably one
of the most advanced
of the seven in its impacts, with a 2011 GRL report putting its
warming effect as equivalent to around 30 %
of atmospheric anthro - CO2, and the recent report putting albedo loss from
arctic sea - ice decline since»79 as providing a forcing equivalent on average to that from 25 %
of the anthro - CO2 levels during the period.
I would suggest you do a simple Google Scholar search
of «
arctic response global
warming» and read for a few days before making any more comments about the
effects of global
warming on the
Arctic.
They estimate that without this offsetting
effect, the
arctic warming of 1.2 °C would have been about 3.0 °C.
This is why a look at the
arctic temperatures reveals that it is WV, as the summers are not
warming north
of 80 north (because it takes more to do so when the mean temp is 275k) than when its 250K Its not that co2 has NO
effect its that because
of larger items around it, its very difficult to say its the climate control knob.
Therefore, the
effect of warming in the
arctic is cooling at the lower latitudes, from increased albedo from clouds and snow, and transportation
of colder air from the
arctic.
If so, then
arctic temperatures are merely a side
effect of events further south, and this is the wrong place to look for evidence
of global
warming.