Not exact matches
Along those lines, it is interesting to note that our evidence
of differential
effects by grade and subject is broadly similar to the results from evaluations
of earlier state - level school -
accountability policies.
To the extent that one believes that states that expected to gain the most from
accountability policies adopted them prior to NCLB, one might view the results we present as an underestimate
of the average
effect of school
accountability.
Supporters
of the new
policy, which went into
effect immediately, say it will increase financial
accountability over millions
of dollars in federal aid.
The
effect of school
accountability policies on children's health.
We chose to label the years that four key
accountability policies went into
effect, in order to look for a possible relationship between alternative school enrollment the implementation
of policies that would penalize schools for poor performance.
Hart's recent work has focused on school choice programs, school
accountability policies, early childhood education
policies, and
effects on students
of exposure to demographically similar teachers.
The study, by
Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE), examines the potential
effects of using single measures in California's CORE districts, where multiple measures
of school performance are included in annual
accountability reports.
He also has work on the
effect of K - 12
accountability policies.
As I wrote into a recent post: ``... it seems that the residual
effects of the federal governments» former [teacher evaluation reform
policies and] efforts are still dominating states» actions with regards to educational
accountability.»
It should be noted, though, that we as a nation have been relying upon similar high - stakes educational
policies since the late 1970s (i.e., for now over 35 years); however, we have literally no research evidence that these high - stakes
accountability policies have yielded any
of their intended
effects, as still perpetually conceptualized (see, for example, Nevada's recent legislative ruling here) and as still advanced via large - and small - scale educational
policies (e.g., we are still A Nation At Risk in terms
of our global competitiveness).
These range from teaching conditions, such as class sizes and salaries, to unhappiness with administrative practices (such as lack
of support, classroom autonomy, or input on decisions) to
policy issues, such as the
effects of testing and
accountability.
The current version
of the law, the No Child Left Behind Act, created a federal system
of testing and
accountability, and many educators and
policy makers contended that that law was too constraining and created some harmful side -
effects.
Many
of these
policies had the
effect of shifting
accountability systems away from the school level (where it was emphasized under No Child Left Behind) to the teacher level.
The Government
Accountability Office (GAO) has been asked to investigate the
effect of current school
policies on racial and socioeconomic integration and student education outcomes, including proficiency rates, high school graduation and dropout rates, and rates
of college enrollment and completion.
While
policy researchers generally see a complex picture
of the
effects of state
accountability systems, they still caution that there are many potential negative consequences (Firestone and Shipps, 2003; Levy and Murnane, 2001; O'Day, 2002).
Over the course
of her career, she has studied how to improve teacher effectiveness (through professional development, coaching, education); the development
of systems for out -
of - school - time programs; the implementation and impact
of test - based promotion
policies; and the
effects of federal
accountability policies on schools, classrooms, and students.
Major changes in public
policy should demand a better
accountability of what is unexplained, especially when the unexplained appears to be much greater than the purported
effect (i.e. AGW) that the changes in public
policy are being imposed to prevent or mitigate.