Carbon offsetting — IOP records details of overseas business flights taken by its staff and makes a financial donation, based on those figures, to a company that takes steps to limit the potentially harmful
effects of carbon dioxide emissions on the environment.
The public does not understand scientific evidence about
the effects of carbon dioxide emissions.
But the impact these gases have on the climate has until now not been as widely studied as
the effects of carbon dioxide emissions.
IPCC scientists have suspected for a decade that aerosols of smoke and other particles from burning rainforest, crop waste and fossil fuels are blocking sunlight and counteracting the warming
effect of carbon dioxide emissions.
But even when carbon dioxide does make its way out of the atmosphere, Earth's natural systems can release other carbon dioxide molecules that were previously stored in the oceans / land back into the atmosphere, making the full
effect of carbon dioxide emissions on surface temperatures much longer than this 5 - 200 year average.
Although such arguments continue to rage, there is no doubt that there is a significant body of scientific opinion (as well as published peer - reviewed literature [5]-RRB- that is sceptical of the alarmist claims by green activists about
the effect of carbon dioxide emissions on the climate.
A far more balanced analysis of
the effect of carbon dioxide emissions on climate was given to the House of Commons» committee on climate change by Professor Richard Lindzen [2], Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, on 22nd February 2012.
Uncertainty about the future climatic
effect of carbon dioxide emissions consists of two parts: the future carbon dioxide concentration given current levels of emissions, and the amount of warming that can be expected from a given carbon dioxide concentration.
Not exact matches
Methane gas is second behind
carbon dioxide in contributing to the greenhouse
effect and global warming; cow flatulence and excretion account for 20 percent, or 100 million tons,
of the total annual global methane
emissions.
In most cases, the surcharges were initially met with hostility, but the positive
effects have been hard to deny: Immediately following the initiation
of zone charging, London saw congestion reduced by a quarter, average speeds increase by 30 percent, and
carbon dioxide emissions decrease by 20 percent, per the Fix NYC report.
Mr Miliband said: «Any increase in
carbon dioxide emissions is worrying, even though these figures do not include the
effect of emissions trading.
On 28 May, a Japanese governmental advisory body laid out options for the mix
of energy sources in 2030, along with projected
effects on the economy and
carbon dioxide emissions.
«Those will have profound
effects on
carbon dioxide emissions,» Stavins said, «because they'll reduce investment in new coal and slow the use
of existing coal.»
In a 1968 report prepared for API in New York City, SRI scientists Elmer Robinson and R.C. Robbins acknowledged some uncertainty concerning the relation between
carbon emissions and rising temperatures, yet said
carbon dioxide was the most likely cause
of the «greenhouse
effect.»
Tangible
effects nearby also appear: clinking our peat soil by water extraction is also a form
of land degradation, leading to more
carbon dioxide emissions, and therefore triggering climate change.
«These
effects include wasted resources, foregone revenue and outsized
emissions of carbon dioxide as well as local pollutants such as sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides.
Indeed, the reduction in the
emission of precursors to polluting particles (sulphur
dioxide) would diminish the concealing
effects of Chinese aerosols, and would speed up warming, unless this
effect were to be compensated elsewhere, for instance by significantly reducing long - life greenhouse gas
emissions and «black
carbon.»
In a paper published this month in Geophysical Research Letters, Lovejoy concludes that a natural cooling fluctuation during this period largely masked the warming
effects of a continued increase in human - made
emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
While examining ways that
carbon dioxide could escape underground storage, Kang wondered about the
effect of old wells on methane
emissions.
7It is particularly ironic that Lomborg would offer such a ridiculously precise estimate
of the cost
of the impacts
of climate change from
carbon dioxide emissions, inasmuch as the entire thrust
of his books chapter on «global warming» is that practically nothing about the
effects of greenhouse gases is known with certainty.
In the time since the 2007 version
of this report, the human
effect on the climate has grown more than 40 percent stronger, thanks to continued
emissions of greenhouse gases and more precision in measurements, with
carbon dioxide leading the charge.
The «Keeling curve» isn't going to turn down any time soon, despite Perry Bebbington's wish to see
effects of slowing
carbon dioxide emissions (Letters, 8 October).
A group
of prominent Republicans released a «conservative» plan to reduce
carbon dioxide emissions today, arguing that replacing Obama - era policies with a
carbon - tax - and - dividend system would be a politically feasible way to fight off the worst
effects of climate change.
«Ultimately, the world must reduce
carbon dioxide emissions or else the climate
effects will overwhelm the ability
of many species to adapt,» co-author Eugenia Bragina said.
If the human population continues to grow, more pressure will be put on
carbon dioxide emissions — leaving future generations vulnerable to the
effects of climate change.
As future climate changes become more severe, people might become interested in ways
of offsetting the
effects of human - induced climate, which could be cheaper than measures to cut
carbon dioxide emissions.
The oceans have absorbed approximately one third
of human - produced CO2
emissions, dampening the
effects of carbon dioxide - driven greenhouse warming.
Or at least it won't for many centuries, as the long - lived nature
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere means that its
effects will be felt for many human generations, absent efforts to curb
emissions or use
[OOOPS; this nonlinear
effect puts their «alternative concept» into the realm
of Trump administration «alternative facts» — BD] Although the deep ocean could dissolve 70 to 80 %
of the expected anthropogenic
carbon dioxide emissions and the sediments could neutralize another 15 % it takes some 400 years for the deep ocean to exchange with the surface and thousands more for changes in sedimentary calcium carbonate to equilibrate with the atmosphere.
Data from satellite observations «suggest that greenhouse models ignore negative feedback produced by clouds and by water vapor, that diminish the warming
effects»
of human
carbon dioxide emissions.
Unfortunately, RECs are almost entirely non-additional (e.g. the wind turbines producing them in Iowa would have been built independent
of the REC income stream), so buying RECs has no real
effect on
carbon dioxide emissions.
Rate
of percentage annual growth for
carbon dioxide has certainly increased since the beginning
of the 21st century, but this should result in a significant change in the rate
of warming any more quickly than the differences between
emission scenarios would, and there (according to the models) the differences aren't significant for the first thirty - some years but progressively become more pronounced from then on — given the cummulative
effects of accumulated
carbon dioxide.
The climate system is already committed to a certain amount
of warming from
carbon dioxide emissions of the past, but the worst
effects of global warming can still be avoided.
Some wonder if this could be the start
of an extended period
of solar indolence that would more than offset the warming
effect of human - made
carbon dioxide emissions.
[Some wonder if this could be the start
of an extended period
of solar indolence that would more than offset the warming
effect of human - made
carbon dioxide emissions]
[UPDATE 5:30 p.m. Voices added below] Most concerns about growing
emissions of carbon dioxide have focused on the gas's heat - trapping
effect on climate.
Until now, power plants have been allowed to dump unlimited amounts
of carbon pollution into the atmosphere — no rules were in
effect that limited their
emissions of carbon dioxide, the primary driver
of global warming.
What's more, the net
effect to society could be large: If 60 million families take advantage
of the program to lower their energy consumption by just 10 %, the total reduction
of 132 million tons
of carbon dioxide would be the equivalent
of the
emissions of Oregon, South Dakota, Vermont, Maine, Idaho, Delaware, Washington, D.C., and Maine combined.
In addition to stopping the seas from rising we shall undertake to protect protect our children and future generations
of unaborted from the
effects of climate change by reducing
emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat - trapping pollutants and by taking sensible steps to prepare for changes in climate that are no longer avoidable.
Humans» use
of fossil fuels, and the resulting
carbon dioxide air
emissions, has no material
effect on climate.
These facts help explain why, in spite
of the Earth's air temperature increasing to a level that the IPCC claims is unprecedented in the the past millennium or more, a recent study by Randall et al. (2013) found that the 14 % extra
carbon dioxide fertilization caused by human
emissions between 1982 and 2010 caused an average worldwide increase in vegetation foliage by 11 % after adjusting the data for precipitation
effects.
It then goes on to speak
of how the horrible
effects of air pollution can be averted by enacting measures to lower
carbon dioxide emissions, which, again, is demonstrably false.
The enhanced Greenhouse
Effect we are now measuring is a human fingerprint because the source
of it is the continued
emission of greenhouse gases, primarily
carbon dioxide, produced by industrial activity.
The science indicates that human influence has contributed to climate change as we've increased our
carbon dioxide emissions and greenhouse gases, further accelerating the greenhouse
effect and average temperature
of the Earth.
While the greenhouse
effect is undeniably real, and while most scientists agree that there has been a rise in global temperatures caused in some part by human
emissions of carbon dioxide, no one knows how much more warming will occur this century or whether it will be dangerous.
«The human impact on global climate is small, and any warming that may occur as a result
of human
carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas
emissions is likely to have little
effect on global temperatures, the cryosphere (ice - covered areas), hydrosphere (oceans, lakes, and rivers), or weather.
(Sec. 340) Requires the EPA Administrator to report to Congress on an analysis
of the
effects of different
carbon dioxide reduction strategies and technologies on the
emissions of mercury, sulfur
dioxide, and nitrogen oxide, which cause acid rain, particulate matter, ground level ozone, mercury contamination, and other environmental problems.
As he watches these difficulties, Ralph Keeling contemplates the unbending math
of carbon dioxide emissions first documented by his father more than a half - century ago and wonders about the future
effects of that increase.
Not later than 18 months after the date
of enactment
of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report that analyzes the
effects of different
carbon dioxide reduction strategies and technologies on the
emissions of mercury, sulfur
dioxide, and nitrogen oxide, which cause acid rain, particulate matter, ground level ozone, mercury contamination, and other environmental problems.
-- Dot Earth Blog — October 3, 2008 — Expert: Some wonder if this could be the start
of an extended period
of solar indolence that would more than offset the warming
effect of human - made
carbon dioxide emissions.