Not exact matches
One important goal included building
leadership by identifying roles and styles required to improve the «instructional core»; considering beliefs, cultural changes, and education strategies to promote high student achievement; reflecting on the
effects of race, class, and culture within the
district.
Marx provides concrete strategies for school and
district leaders to: • Engage students, staff, and colleagues in active learning and problem - solving skills, • Build adaptability and resilience in
leadership roles, • Keep in touch with rapidly changing institutions and communities, • Understand and plan for the
effects of societal development, and • Release ingenuity and creativity in others
While our analysis
of principal survey data suggests a loose - linkage explanation for the relationship between state
leadership and building - level
leadership, it also indicates the need to explore the role
of districts as moderators
of state -
leadership effects.
We found a significant main
effect on only two
of the six variables on the second round
of the principal survey: Principal rating
of district shared leadership skills and District policies to support organizational l
district shared
leadership skills and
District policies to support organizational l
District policies to support organizational learning.
We know from other studies that larger, urban
districts tend to be less effective, particularly for lower - income students; but we do not know to what extent, or how,
leadership effects might explain that pattern
of outcomes.
School
district leadership that works: the
effect of superintendent
leadership on student achievement.
The moderating
effects of organizational characteristics are to be expected, since
district size and school size almost always «make a difference,» no matter what the focus
of the research is.180 Elementary schools are typically more sensitive than secondary schools to
leadership influence, although previous leader - efficacy research has reported mostly non-significant
effects.181 And the rapid turnover
of principals has been widely decried as anathema to school improvement efforts.182 Now we have some evidence that the positive
effects of leader efficacy are also moderated by school and
district size (the larger the organization, the less sense
of efficacy among principals).
Despite the best efforts
of the teachers to provide
leadership for their school, along with efforts by the
district to establish formal teacher -
leadership positions, the combined
effects of frequent principal turnover and frequent teacher turnover made it impossible for this school to sustain any momentum in its improvement efforts.
Research about successful school and
district leadership practices in contexts such as these is still in its infancy, even though the capacities and motivations
of local leaders will significantly determine the
effects of such contexts on students.
Also, it seems likely that different patterns
of leadership distribution throughout
districts and schools, for example, might be associated with different levels
of effects on students.
The General Assembly conceived
of the Commissioner's Network as a partnership between the State and the local educational
district: the State would provide additional resources and managerial
leadership whereas the local
district would supply the human creativity and energy needed to put the turnaround plan into
effect.
LEAD
districts formed a learning network to examine the
effects of leadership on learning, analyze existing obstacles and explore strategic interventions that could, over time, produce new policies and practices to support better student achievement.
Much
of this research treats the
district as an independent variable acting as an organizational entity without explicitly and systematically examining
leadership practices and
effects.