Sentences with phrase «effects of human activity»

Environmental Law Environmental law is shaped by treaties, statutes, regulations, common and customary laws which address the effects of human activity on the natural environment.

The model will be used to predict both the monthly and the cumulative effects of human activity in the region - all agriculture, transportation, energy, and industry - related decisions - over the next 20 years.

No, in fact I say the opposite: the probability of a positive relationship between the external effects of human activity and climate change is almost certainly one.

There is no going back to some climatic «simpler time» minus the effects of human activity.

To identify the effects of human activity on temperature, we simulate the model (estimation sample 1960 — 1998) with post 1998 values of solar insolation, SOI, and volcanic sulfates held at their 1998 level while allowing greenhouse gas concentrations and sulfur emissions to evolve as observed.

I am not sure how many of you are interested in the philosopy of science, but the discussion above is a good example of what has happened as a result of «consensus science» applied to the effects of human activity - sourced CO2.

Then modified: «The fourth paragraph, first sentence, recommends an enhanced effort to understand the effects of human activity on Earth's climate.

The term refers to the immense effects of human activity on all aspects of the Earth's physical systems and on life on the planet.

Pointing out how hot 1934 was in the contiental US is a good way to stress the adverse effects of human activity on the climate and the weather.

For those of us who used to admire science, and who are concerned about the possible adverse effects of human activity on the environment, the behavior of the climatological community gatekeepers of credibility is disappointing.

The extinction rate of animals and plants is 100 times higher than it would be without the effects of human activity WWF

The ozone hole opened the world's eyes to the global effects of human activity on the atmosphere.

Otherwise we're simply monitoring the effects of human activity in our neighborhoods, without any reference to the overall picture, about which we presently know damn little.

A nice animation of the basics of the greenhouse effect and the effects of human activity on enhancing the effect:

Ms. Abrams melds contradictions of materials, macro and micro scales, the natural and the human made, all to carry her ever - present concern for the effects of human activity on nature.

The bottom line, according to a group of experts not involved in any of these studies: Scientists don't know much about how sunlight interacts with our planet, and until they understand it, they can't accurately predict any possible effects of human activity on climate change.

The effects of human activity have long been cited as a primary cause of global climate change, but new research from NASA has revealed that our use of technology also appears to be having an impact not just on the planet, but on Earth's near - space environment as well.

These results imply a greater potential than previously thought for fossil fuel industry efficiency improvements to mitigate the effects of human activity on the climate.

One of those groups is SkyTruth of Shepherdstown, W. Va., founded by geologist John Amos in 2001 to monitor the effects of human activity on the environment using remote - sensing and mapping technologies.

That's why it is so important that they be protected from the effects of human activity on the forests where they live.

While the effects of human activity on the seal population can be detrimental — for example through a high rate of fishing bycatch mortality as observed on Lake Saimaa — a novel conservation method can help the seal population to cope with climate change.

«Because the complexity of the climate makes accurate prediction difficult, the APS urges an enhanced effort to understand the effects of human activity on the Earth's climate, and to provide the technological options for meeting the climate challenge in the near and longer terms.

Volcanic eruptions and solar variations were still plausible causes of change, and some argued these would swamp any effects of human activities.

Environmental Chemistry (ENV): The study of chemical species in the natural environment, including the effects of human activities, such as the design of products and processes that reduce or eliminate the use or generation of hazardous substances.

KS3 lesson looking at the environment and the negative effect of human activity.

Why don't you give as much attention to the over 19000 American Scientists who have signed a petition which very much doubts the effect of human activity on global warming.

Initiatives like NEON and the Long Term Ecological Research Network aim to help us to track and understand the effects of human activities on ecosystems that provide valuable services to society.

2) CO2 and trace greenhouse gases are increasing rapidly in concentration as a direct effect of human activity.

Dismissing any effect of human activities on the climate however... seems stupidly ignorant.

Natural variability is still to be properly measured and defined and until we do this, the effect of human activity will forever be pure guesswork.

For comparison, geothermal heat, the heat from Earth's hot interior leaking out through the crust, is about 45 TW or three times the direct heating effect of human activities.

You're right, & IMO, the net effect of human activity since c. AD 1950 has been to cool rather than warm the planet, although not much in either direction.

The concept of sustainable development does imply limits — not absolute limits but limitations imposed by the present state of technology and social organization on environmental resources and by the ability of the biosphere to absorb the effects of human activities.

I doubt that determining «the effect of human activities on climate» was listed as part of their mission in 1980.

The main objectives, set for the WCRP at its inception and still valid today, are to determine the predictability of climate and to determine the effect of human activities on climate.

On a more positive note, federal environment minister Greg Hunt has promised that the Australian government will be «examining the cumulative effect of human activities and natural forces rather than looking at impacts in isolation».

It gives us our firmest and most accurate evidence of effects of human activities on our global environment.

And no one can «do the match» so as to determine any such effect of human activity with any certainty or accuracy.

He wrote in his autobiography ``... it was clear that the first and greatest need was to establish the facts of the past record of the natural climate in times before any side effects of human activities could well be important.»

Chad Wozniak says: October 7, 2012 at 9:08 pm «And no one can «do the match» so as to determine any such effect of human activity with any certainty or accuracy.

«The effect of human activity on our climate is no longer subtle.

According to the authors, «there is now a forest «fire deficit» in the western United States attributable to the combined effects of human activities, ecological, and climate changes.

«When the Climatic Research Unit was founded, it was clear that the first and greatest need was to establish the facts of the past record of the natural climate in times before any side effects of human activities could well be important.»

«When the Climatic Research Unit was founded, it was clear that the first need was to establish the facts of the past record of this natural climate in times before any side effects of human activities could well be important.»

Are you saying that the aggregate and cumulative external effects of human activities on climate change are negligible for the relevant time horizon (ie until life on earth stops for reasons not under the control of humans) or are you saying you disagree with all or some of the quantifications methods available at present?

H3: The negative effects of human activities on the environment can be reduced through changes in human behavior.

To assign a more specific date to the onset of the «anthropocene» seems somewhat arbitrary, but we propose the latter part of the 18th century... because, during the past two centuries, the global effects of human activities have become clearly noticeable.

There is very high confidence that the net effect of human activities since 1750 has been one of warming.

Not exact matches

Stanford Graduate School of Business Professor Jeffrey Pfeffer wrote in the journal, Academy of Management Perspectives, that, «Although most of the research and public pressure concerning sustainability has been focused on the effects of business and organizational activity on the physical environment, companies and their management practices profoundly affect the human and social environment as well.»

Although the machines involved are extraordinarily dangerous, the moral principle governing their use is perfectly ordinary: It is the familiar one that human beings should engage in an activity that poses dangers to others only if, in the totality of the circumstances, doing so is reasonable» i.e., if the good to be achieved, taking account of the probability of success, is proportionate to the possible ill effects.