«Palma is a shining example of what the positive
effects of the natural gas discovery will have on towns such as these.»
A key issue in considering the decision has been the potential climate
effects of natural gas versus coal.
Dr. Nirav Shah, who was appointed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo as the state's health commissioner, is expected to be asked by state lawmakers about a study he's conducting on the potential health
effects of natural gas drilling.
- The governor said he still expects a report on
the effects of natural gas hydrofracking from the Department of Health by year's end.
Even if CO2 Scorecard is correct that
the effect of natural gas on emissions has been less than previously believed, delivering one quarter of U.S. carbon cuts is still «pretty significant,» said Michael Tubman, a senior fellow at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES), a nonprofit policy organization.
This report is an early step in studying the potentially significant global warming
effect of natural gas leakage in San Francisco.
Not exact matches
In
effect, the U.S. had an advantage from being far behind — in the mid-2000s, the U.S. was very short
natural gas, and built a lot
of import capacity, as shown in the graph below.
About half
of the cost is due to increased consumption
of natural gas that will be the side -
effect of cracking down on coal.
We would expect that abundant
natural gas would have the
effect of enabling a move away from dirty coal.
PDC utilizes an active hedging program for oil and
natural gas to reduce the
effects of variable commodity prices and help insulate cash flow to help fund its capital expenditure program.
Consider, for example, the
effect of the development
of fracking to produce oil and
natural gas, which has given the US a huge production advantage.
Presented by The Canadian Institute Energy Group, speakers at the recent BC
Natural Gas Symposium in Vancouver, British Columbia covered a number
of current topics such as the
effects of... Read more»
Shortly after the climate moves came into
effect, a drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing unearthed new deposits
of natural gas in British Columbia.
But a group
of Cornell scientists who study the
effects of climate change say New Yorkers are using more
natural gas than ever.
However, a group
of Cornell scientists who study the
effects of climate change say New Yorkers are using more
natural gas than ever.
The
natural gas in question is not in jeopardy
of being lost while the moratorium is in place, therefore it is in New York's best interest to exercise patience and prevent hasty decisions that could lead to devastating
effects that impact us all.
New York's health commissioner is still declining to speculate when his agency will finish a review
of the health
effects of hydraulic fracturing for
natural gas, meaning the state appears no closer to allowing the controversial drilling process.
The Quinnipiac poll finds that by a narrow four point margin, New Yorkers surveyed believe that the economic benefits
of natural gas drilling, including job creation, outweigh the potential harmful environmental
effects.
«Consequently, the Nigerian Union
of Petroleum and
Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG), Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) and other related oil and gas unions hereby suspend the industrial action embarked upon by their members, with immediate effe
Gas Workers (NUPENG), Independent Petroleum Marketers Association
of Nigeria (IPMAN) and other related oil and
gas unions hereby suspend the industrial action embarked upon by their members, with immediate effe
gas unions hereby suspend the industrial action embarked upon by their members, with immediate
effect.
Scientists can measure how much energy greenhouse
gases now add (roughly three watts per square meter), but what eludes precise definition is how much other factors — the response
of clouds to warming, the cooling role
of aerosols, the heat and
gas absorbed by oceans, human transformation
of the landscape, even the
natural variability
of solar strength — diminish or strengthen that
effect.
The
natural seeps
of gas and oil could contribute to the overall levels in the ocean water, possibly complicating scientists» attempts to understand how much oil spilled and what the
effects will be on the gulf.
While I appreciate that Peter Aldhous's article was primarily concerned with the immediate health questions raised by the process
of fracking, or cracking rock to extract
natural gas from shale beds (28 January, p 8), its
effects on climate change can not be ignored since that, too, is likely to be bad for our health.
So this
effect could either be the result
of natural variability in Earth's climate, or yet another
effect of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases like water vapor trapping more heat and thus warming sea - surface temperatures.
In a paper published this month in Geophysical Research Letters, Lovejoy concludes that a
natural cooling fluctuation during this period largely masked the warming
effects of a continued increase in human - made emissions
of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases.
The combined
effect of the three, the scientists found, is that the global energy system could experience unprecedented changes in the growth
of natural gas production and significant changes to the types
of energy used, but without much reduction to projected climate change if new mitigation policies are not put in place to support the deployment
of renewable energy technologies.
«The
effect is that abundant
natural gas alone will do little to slow climate change,» said lead author Haewon McJeon, an economist at the Department
of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Rather than using complex computer models to estimate the
effects of greenhouse -
gas emissions, Lovejoy examines historical data to assess the competing hypothesis: that warming over the past century is due to
natural long - term variations in temperature.
BURNING UP The heat radiated by burning fossil fuels such as
natural gas, shown, is overshadowed within months by the greenhouse
gas effect of the released carbon dioxide, new research shows.
«The methodology can not be used to infer anything about the direct impacts
of specific policies, such as power plant emissions limits or renewable portfolio standards, or the
effect that changes in relative prices may have on fuel choice, such as the impact
of the change in supply or price
of natural gas or renewables may have had on the competitiveness
of coal.
The assessment examines the following content; global warming, the greenhouse
effect /
gases,
natural and human causes
of past climate change, evidence
of the little ice age, features
of tropical storms and the
effects and response to tropical storms.
The original thesis had played out, but the
effects of the drop in
natural gas prices had to a large extent offset the rebound from the hit shares took when
gas properties were revalued down in June 2011.
The water's
natural gas content is considerable, which has calming
effects and is good for certain conditions
of the central nervous system, like neurasthenia.
Summer Knight Glut, a 1987 excerpt from this series, marks the
effect of a surplus
of a
natural resource by recombining detritus from its manifestation as consumer product: It is made
of gas stations.
No — it is just part and parcel
of the same old question
of whether the pattern
of the 20th and 21st century can be ascribed to
natural variability without the
effect of anthropogenic greenhouse
gases.
Because
of this marginal
effect, the change in forcing due to a change in carbon dioxide concentration is proportional to the
natural logarithm
of the fractional change in concentration
of this
gas.
This puts pressure on the national system
of natural gas pricing, and the resulting
effect is that power operators in other states seek to avoid paying higher prices by shifting more to coal.
Also
natural is that higher concentrations
of these
gases should intensify this
effect.
Also, due to the multiplicity
of anthropogenic and
natural effects on the climate over this time (i.e. aerosols, land - use change, greenhouse
gases, ozone changes, solar, volcanic etc.) it is difficult to accurately define the forcings.
Any change in the strength
of natural (volcanic, solar) influences based on historical variations will have an opposite
effect on the influence
of greenhouse
gases, and thus on man - made emissions.
Lisa McKenzie
of the Colorado School
of Public Health, who — like Hill — has expressed concerns about the health risks posed by
natural gas operations and has done research pointing to health
effects from drilling, declined to directly critique the paper.
Multi-signal detection and attribution analyses, which quantify the contributions
of different
natural and anthropogenic forcings to observed changes, show that greenhouse
gas forcing alone during the past half century would likely have resulted in greater than the observed warming if there had not been an offsetting cooling
effect from aerosol and other forcings.
This past month was anything but short on developments
of interest to environmentalists, with a deal being inked to build the Nabucco
natural -
gas pipeline, European funders pulling out
of the controversial IlÄ ± su Dam project, and the final stage
of Turkey's ban on indoor smoking going into
effect.
I think the analysis that best captures this
effect is the one done by Larry Cathles (see here and here), which concludes that even with 1 percent leakage, on the centennial time scale switching to
natural gas gives you 40 percent
of the benefit
of switching to entirely carbon - free energy.
This industry was doing before earlier layers
of regulation on
natural gas development went into
effect.
For instance, the warming that began in the early 20th century (1925 - 1944) is consistent with
natural variability
of the climate system (including a generalized lack
of significant volcanic activity, which has a cooling
effect), solar forcing, and initial forcing from greenhouse
gases.
The other major uncertainty surrounding the environmental impact
of natural gas is the
effect of methane leakages, or «fugitive methane emissions» along the delivery chain.
In particular, the authors find fault with IPCC's conclusions relating to human activities being the primary cause
of recent global warming, claiming, contrary to significant evidence that they tend to ignore, that the comparatively small influences
of natural changes in solar radiation are dominating the influences
of the much larger
effects of changes in the atmospheric greenhouse
gas concentrations on the global energy balance.
The most statistics can tell us at present is that there does appear to be a genuine warming trend in figure A. Whether this trend is the
effect of greenhouse
gas emissions or
of a
natural fluctuation due to some as - yet - undiscovered mechanism can not be determined from an analysis
of the global mean temperature alone.
Higher density sources
of fuel such as coal and
natural gas utilized in centrally - produced power stations actually improve the environmental footprint
of the poorest nations while at the same time lifting people from the scourge
of poverty... Developing countries in Asia already burn more than twice the coal that North America does, and that discrepancy will continue to expand... So, downward adjustments to North American coal use will have virtually no
effect on global CO2 emissions (or the climate), no matter how sensitive one thinks the climate system might be to the extra CO2 we are putting back into the atmosphere.
However, the increasing efficiency
of home heating systems (lower average
gas use per customer) masks some
of the
effect of the increasing number
of natural gas customers, even when normalized for weather.