Sentences with phrase «effects of sugar consumption»

NPR reported on the first soda tax to be passed in the US, with voters in Berkeley, California, passing the measure aimed at reducing the effects of sugar consumption on health, particularly increased rates of obesity and diabetes.

No previous studies have investigated the direct effect of sugar consumption on the development of breast cancer using breast cancer animal models or examined specific mechanisms, she added.

No previous studies have investigated the direct effect of sugar consumption on the development of breast cancer using breast cancer animal models or examined specific mechanisms, she added.

Not exact matches

The American Beverage Association dismissed the study in a statement, saying it did «not show that consuming sugar - sweetened beverages causes chronic diseases and the authors themselves acknowledge that they are at best estimating effects of sugar - sweetened beverage consumption.»

Although sales taxes on soft drinks in Ireland and France have both been associated with a reduction in consumption, the health effects have not been studied.15 16 No significant effect on obesity of US state sales taxes has been found, although the level of taxation there has probably been too low to affect health.13 17 The modelled estimates of the health effect of a 20 % sugar sweetened drink tax in the United States vary, but such a tax has been predicted to reduce obesity by up to three percentage points.13 18 The effect of a sugar sweetened drink tax in the UK has not, until now, been formally estimated.

The markedly different levels of consumption of sugar sweetened drinks in the United States and the UK (735 kJ / person / day in the US compared with 209 kJ in the UK) suggest that a tax may have a lesser effect in the UK.12 19

The drink category that shows a relatively large substitution effect (cross price value > 0.10; that is, a 2 % or greater increase in consumption for a 20 % price rise) for price rises of concentrated sugar sweetened drinks is concentrated diet soft drinks.

Whereas estimates from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey and Living Costs and Food Survey are broadly comparable (123 mL / adult / day versus 168 mL / person / day), the British Soft Drinks Association's figures are threefold to fourfold higher.48 61 The level and pattern of consumption will determine the magnitude of the public health effects of a sugar sweetened drinks tax, as well as its effect on health inequalities.

In terms of own price elasticity values, a recent meta - analysis estimated an average own price effect for carbonated sugar sweetened drinks (a near equivalent of the category non-concentrated sugar sweetened drinks, which predominantly includes carbonated drinks) of − 0.93, larger than our value of − 0.81.51 Our estimated value is also at the lower end of the range of own price elasticities frequently cited for sugar sweetened drinks of − 0.8 to − 1.0, based on one large review.52 Our own price estimate is comparable to experimental data (a 25 % reduction for a 35 % price rise) in a canteen study.53 However, all these estimates may be influenced by US studies in which higher estimates may reflect higher levels of consumption.

The growing evidence of the negative health effects of sugar sweetened drinks has led to calls for action to limit consumption.1 2 Several options exist, including controls on the marketing of sugar sweetened drinks, limits on portion sizes, and taxation.3 In the United Kingdom, the sale of sugar sweetened drinks in schools and their advertisement during children's television is banned.

The rise in sugar sweetened drink consumption has been noted to have displaced milk from the diet, and this may partly account for the apparent detrimental effects of regular sugar sweetened drink consumption on bone health.57

In terms of effect on consumption, Ng et al estimated a reduction in sugar sweetened drink intake of 104 mL (10 %) per person per week compared with our predicted reduction of around 15 %.19 The substitution effects predicted in Ng et al's study are very slight, and as a result the predicted change in energy intake is larger (net decrease of 24 kJ / person / day compared with our estimate of 17 kJ / person / day).

The lower levels of baseline sugar sweetened drink consumption in the UK compared with the US may in part explain why the effect on obesity that we estimate in the UK is much less than that estimated in the US.12 The differences with respect to other modelling studies may also be partly explained by their use of higher own price elasticity values for sugar sweetened drinks than we have calculated and used here.18 22 52 We can not make direct comparisons between the results of our study and the results of recent studies of the effect of reducing sugar sweetened drink consumption on body weight in children, 5 7 as the relation between energy balance and change in body mass index in children who are growing is different from that in adults.

We chose to model the effects on body weight because good evidence (from both trials and epidemiological studies) links regular consumption of sugar sweetened drinks to weight gain.8 10 12 Moreover, data from longitudinal studies support the idea that changes in the price of sugar sweetened drinks are linked to changes in body weight.20 Other groups have used this form of modelling to estimate the effects of a sugar sweetened drink tax on obesity.18 21 22

In terms of substitution effects, the major difference between our estimates and those from the US is that our data indicate that diet soft drinks are a substitute for sugar sweetened drinks, whereas US data suggest that diet soft drinks are a complement (as the price of sugar sweetened drinks goes up, consumption of diet drinks goes down).18 22 This may explain why a US tax on sugar sweetened drinks has been so heavily resisted, as a «double whammy» on sales of both diet soft drinks and sugar sweetened drinks would occur.18.

Multiple recent studies have linked disturbing side effects and long - term health problems to the consumption of artificial additives and sugar substitutes like aspartame.

This study does not show that consuming sugar - sweetened beverages causes chronic diseases and the authors themselves acknowledge that they are at best estimating effects of sugar - sweetened beverage consumption.

Non-linear effects of soda taxes on consumption and weight outcomes [i], published in the US publication Health Economics casts serious doubt on the effectiveness of imposing a tax on sugar - sweetened beverages to curb obesity.

Non-linear effects of soda taxes on consumption and weight outcome [1], published in the US publication Health Economics casts serious doubt on the effectiveness of imposing a tax on sugar - sweetened beverages to curb obesity.

Reviews of the health effects of sugar sweetened beverages that are performed by authors with financial ties to food companies are five times more likely to conclude that there is no association of sugar consumption with weight gain compared to those with other sponsors (relative risk: 5.0, 95 % CI: 1.3 — 19.3)[42].

The food and beverage industry frequently sponsors research on the health effects of added sugars consumption and has produced reviews for policy purposes.

Reviews of the health effects of sugar sweetened beverages performed by authors with financial ties to the sugar industry are five times more likely to conclude there is no association of sugar consumption with weight gain [42].

This observation has precipitated numerous observational studies and randomized controlled trials of the effect of added sugars or SSB consumption on body weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors (6, 8, 9).

In the same way that soda made with cane sugar in lieu of high fructose corn syrup is not a healthful beverage, there needs to be a clear message that «slime - free» ground beef is by no means the golden standard, especially when an ever - growing body of research continues to highlight the harmful effects of red meat consumption (the latest: it «contributes substantially to premature death»).

For example, in men with prediabetes, abundant consumption of foods containing starch and sugar in the evening had a negative effect on their blood glucose regulation.

A study published in June backs him up: Researchers found that higher consumption of fiber, whole grains and produce had protective effects — while a diet packed with added sugars and refined grains was associated with increased risk.

This study showed consumption of resistant starch had a favorable effect on cholesterol and blood sugar levels in overweight individuals.

To receive the libido - enhancing effects of chocolate, I recommend dramatically reducing sugar consumption in the rest of your diet and only eating dark chocolate.

Consumption of a high - fat, high - sugar diet may have detrimental effects on the hippocampus, which has consequences on memory function and appetite control and sets up a vicious cycle to sustain overeating (40).

It's important to note the reduced consumption of carbohydrates in the study --- some researchers have called Alzheimer's type 3 diabetes due to the deleterious effects of excess sugar and carbohydrates on the brain.

Type 2 diabetes refers to a condition where the cells of the body become resistant to the effects of insulin, which is typically the result of obesity and / or the consumption of excessive amounts of sugar and high carbohydrate foods associated with the standard American diet.

The sad thing is that most people are not aware of the devastating effects that excess sugar consumption has on the body.

The ratio of fat, sugar, and salt in processed foods cause a near - constant release of positive chemicals that over time need more input for the same effect, leading to higher rates of consumption.

Carbohydrate - rich foods typically have a high Glycemic Index (GI), which is a measurement of the food's effect on your blood sugar after consumption.

Because sugar is devoid of minerals, vitamins, fiber, and has such a deteriorating effect on the endocrine system, major researchers and major health organizations (American Dietetic Association and American Diabetic Association) agree that sugar consumption in America is one of the 3 major causes of degenerative disease.

However, in light of advances in our understanding of sugar consumption — and its effects on the body based on scientific studies — the WHO will soon officially recommend half that amount.

In my opinion, regardless of what the effects of sugar are and despite understanding why is sugar bad for you, it's almost impossible to completely avoid the consumption of sugar.

Consumption of Aloe Vera has beneficial effects on reducing blood sugar levels.

More research is necessary in order to unequivocally identify the primary cause of the Warburg effect, and regardless, this research does not prove that limited sugar consumption would prevent cancer from developing from alternative mechanisms.

The overall effect of consuming a diet high in sugar on these numerous health markers is likely more detrimental to overall health compared to increased consumption of saturated fat, which can increase LDL but at the same time raise HDL.

A comparison was made between the effects of lowering sugar consumption and the effects of the drug tamoxifen.

The present long - term prospective study is the first to investigate the association of sugar consumption from sweet food / beverages with prevalent, incident and recurrent mood disorders, while also examining the effect these disorders might have on subsequent habitual sugar intake.

The Institute of Medicine recommended no more than 25 % calories from added sugar based on the NHANES III study of increased consumption of added sugar and reduced intake of macronutrients, especially at the level of more than 25 %.3 However, this recommendation did not consider health effects.

For instance, the consumption of sugar - sweetened beverages, sweets, and processed foods may make it harder to do so, whereas the consumption of whole grains, fruits, and vegetables might make it easier.4 - 10 Physical activity should also influence long - term weight gain, but evidence to support this expectation has been surprisingly inconsistent.11 - 14 In addition, the duration of television viewing and of sleep may influence energy consumption, energy expenditure, or both.15 - 19 Different lifestyle behaviors have often been evaluated separately, thus limiting relative comparisons or the quantification of combined effects.

Data has been mixed, with some studies showing high amounts of long term sugar consumption having no effect on mood, whereas others show sugar and carbohydrate consumption having quite a robust effect on aggression and mood (3).

Risk factors for GDM that are modifiable during pregnancy include excessive weight gain which is a very frequent phenomenon that is observed in a majority of pregnant women (in up to 75 % of pregnancies).35 36 Further modifiable risk factors include lifestyle behaviours such as low levels of physical activity, high fat and animal protein consumption, high intake of added sugar and low intake of vegetable and fruit fiber.37 Regular food intake and avoidance of snacking can have beneficial effects on weight and glucose tolerance, but this has mostly been tested outside of pregnancy.38 — 42 Another key factor is mental health.