Limitations include reliance on self - reported measures, duration of the WLC condition was significantly shorter than the treatment time therefore a comparison of the full
effects of treatment versus no treatment was not possible, and exclusion of patients receiving concomitant treatment and those using antidepressant medications which may reduce generalizability to the whole population of treatment - seeking depressed patients.
Not exact matches
Dr. Bachhuber and coauthors conclude: «To fully understand the
effect of medical cannabis on the use
of other drugs, prospective longitudinal studies randomizing patients to cannabis
versus other
treatments are urgently needed.»
Steven Pavletic, who heads the Graft -
versus - Host and Autoimmunity Section at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, says the standard
treatments — corticosteroids such as prednisone — «carpet bomb» the immune system, causing a host
of side
effects and weakening the immune response to potentially deadly infections.
Bagla attributes this low rate
of side
effects to the fact that PAE is conducted via the femoral artery
versus other
treatments, which enter through the urethra or penis.
In patients who are cured, the long term side -
effects of the chemotherapy and immune suppression
treatment as well as any graft
versus host disease.
In a new study published in Pharmacopsychiatry, Crocus sativus L.
versus citalopram in the
treatment of major depressive disorder with anxious distress: a double - blind, controlled clinical trial, saffron (Crocus sativus L.) has been shown to have both antidepressant and antianxiety
effects.
Keep in mind the side
effects and the time needed for each
treatment option, including the risks
versus the benefits
of each option.
We used a 2 - way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests to determine the
effects of sex and reproductive status (
treatment = intact
versus sterilized) on the areas
of the home ranges occupied by our study animals during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons.
The
treatment appeared to have stronger
effects on cognitive
versus emotional aspects
of symptoms, suggesting that perhaps the
treatment protocol should be revised to improve its impact on emotional aspects
of psychosis.
However, for both child abuse and parent stress, the average
effect sizes were not different from zero, suggesting a lack
of evidence for
effects in these areas.108 Earlier meta - analytic reviews have also noted the lack
of sizable
effects in preventing child maltreatment — again citing the different intensity
of surveillance
of families in the
treatment versus control groups as an explanation (though the authors did report that home visiting was associated with an approximately 25 percent reduction in the rate
of childhood injuries).109 Another review focusing on the quality
of the home environment also found evidence for a significant overall
effect of home - visiting programs.110 More recently, Harriet MacMillan and colleagues published a review
of interventions to prevent child maltreatment, and identified the Nurse - Family Partnership and Early Start programs as the most effective with regard to preventing maltreatment and childhood injuries.
Teaching mindfulness skills for daily use
versus for only in high - risk situations has the potential to boost the longevity
of MBRP
treatment effects.
This statement is supported by Stein, Epstein, Raynor, Kilanowski, and Paluch (2005) who reported that the change in paternal acceptance
versus rejection during
treatment was strongly associated with the effectiveness
of a behavioral family - based pediatric overweight
treatment (even though these results do not allow for causal interpretation
of effects).