Sentences with phrase «efficacy measures»

The phrase "efficacy measures" refers to methods or assessments used to determine how well something (such as a product, treatment, or strategy) is able to produce the desired or intended effects or outcomes. Full definition
In 2005 only the aggregate efficacy measure explains significant variation in student annual achievement scores (5 %).
«Based on the results seen in the INO - VATE ALL trial, Besponsa improved multiple efficacy measures, including rates of hematologic remission, MRD negativity, and stem cell transplantation,» said lead study investigator Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in a press release.
«Prespecified secondary efficacy measures, including the complete response rate, the overall response rate, and overall survival, also showed consistent patterns of clinically meaningful benefit with venetoclax plus rituximab,» the researchers wrote.
Results of a regression analysis indicate that neither LCE alone, LSE alone, or an aggregate efficacy measure account for significant variation in the three - year mean student achievement change score.
The aggregate efficacy measure explained 9 % of the variation in leader behavior; LSE explained 7 %; and LCE had no unique effect.
Primary efficacy measure: response (Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI - I) score of very much or much improved based on the assessor's perception of improvement, anxiety scale scores and patient self - report).
Measures utilized include the Traumatic Events Screening Inventory for Children — Brief Form (TESI - C - Brief), the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index (RI), the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED - C), the Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report for Youth (SAS - SR - Y), the Coping Efficacy measure, the Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
All three annual achievement scores are significantly related to our aggregate efficacy measure -LRB-.28,.24 and.25).
However, there are consistent and significant relationships with each year «s annual achievement scores (% of students achieving at or above the proficient level) for our other two efficacy measures.
The aggregate efficacy measure and LCE explain comparable amounts of variation in achievement scores for 2003 (7 and 8 %), and 2004 (5 and 7 %).
Table 2.2.4 reports correlations between alternative estimates of student achievement and our three leader - efficacy measures.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z