Sentences with phrase «efficacy uncertainty ranges»

Since the values given are stated to be «mean and 95 % confidence intervals», I can not see any justification for the efficacy uncertainty ranges actually being 95 % confidence intervals for a single run, centered on the mean efficacy calculated over all runs.

As already noted, my iRF efficacy uncertainty ranges are much narrower than Marvel et al.'s.

Not exact matches

Their revised primary (iRF) estimate of historical transient efficacy is, per Table S1, 1.0 (0.995 at the centre of the symmetrical uncertainty range).

AR5, after surveying a wider range of evidence, reached similar conclusions, and accordingly in other cases estimated ERF to be the same as RF, with an implied efficacy estimate of one, but gave wider ranges for ERF to allow for uncertainty in the relationship between ERF and RF.