The reason is that
the efficient Combined Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGT) are used for baseload and intermediate load.
Not exact matches
GE's H - class heavy - duty
gas turbines are currently the world's largest and most
efficient gas turbines, capable of converting fuel and air into electricity at more than 62 percent power - plant efficiency when matched with a steam turbine generator, a setup known as
combined cycle.
Although a
combined cycle natural
gas plant could easily meet the standard, even the most
efficient coal plant would have to cut about 40 percent of its CO2 emissions.
Compare that with (say) a
combined -
cycle gas turbine (60 %
efficient), minimal transmission losses (compared with transporting liquid fuels), high - efficiency batteries (~ 85 %) and electric motors (~ 85 %).
The power sector added a significant amount of new natural
gas - fired generating capacity over the last decade, much of which was in the form of
efficient combined -
cycle units.
«Wind power is an extraordinarily expensive and inefficient way of reducing CO2 emissions when compared with the option of investing in
efficient and flexible
gas combined -
cycle plans,» he concludes.
To ensure reliability, generating companies have built
efficient, low - cost natural
gas combined cycle plants to back - up the intermittent renewable plants.
In recent years, the drop in natural
gas prices, coupled with highly
efficient natural
gas - fired
combined -
cycle technology, made natural
gas an attractive choice to serve baseload demand previously met by coal - fired generation.
Natural
gas - fired
combined cycle units are more
efficient at over 50 % now, less expensive and quicker to build than coal - based systems.
Two basic factors contributed to lower electricity generation carbon intensity (CO2 / kilowatthour) since 2005: substitution of coal - fired generation with the less - carbon - intensive and more
efficient combined -
cycle natural
gas - fired generation, and growth in non-carbon electricity generation, especially wind and solar.
But again, on technologies like highly
efficient ultra supercritical coal or
combined cycle natural
gas (which I supported in above comments)-- what are some policies that would make the U.S. more competitive in the $ 28 trillion world market on new energy?
The take home message from this is that, in an
efficient grid with 17 % of electricity generated by wind and 53 % by relatively new
combined cycle gas turbines, the wind generation is only 53 % effective at avoiding CO2 emissions.
Worse, these would need to be inefficient simple -
cycle gas turbines (due to the need to be able to ramp up and down within minutes if the wind changes) meaning that the CO2 emissions reductions compared to using
gas alone (using more
efficient combined -
cycle gas turbines) are negligible.