Not exact matches
They found that because natural gas plants are overall more
efficient than
coal plants, producing more energy per
unit of carbon, they could cause less warming in the long term.
... In the U.S. electricity supply sector, the cost benchmark for reducing carbon dioxide emissions lies with substitution of natural gas for
coal, especially older, less
efficient units.
However, as China continues to replace older, less
efficient generators with more
efficient units, China's power sector
coal consumption is expected to peak as soon as 2018, at 4,800 million metric tons.
Natural gas - fired combined cycle
units are more
efficient at over 50 % now, less expensive and quicker to build than
coal - based systems.
But where
coal - fired capacity is expanding, in emerging economies for example, less
efficient, subcritical
units dominate, primarily due to the absence of minimum efficiency policies.»
The figure below shows the climate impacts over time (measured in
units called radiative forcing) of existing
coal (the dashed black line), new high -
efficient coal plants (the solid black line), and new gas plants (the green line).
The report also identifies that if the least
efficient 500 TWh of power generation in China's national
coal fleet were to be upgraded to the same technology used at Zhoushan
Unit 4, this could reduce China's CO2 by about 850 million tonnes each year and it would achieve this reduction at a much lower cost than any other equivalent, scalable, emission reduction strategy currently available in China.
Even the Philippines» relatively modest
coal fleet could achieve absolute savings of almost 30 per cent by adopting the most
efficient USC
units.