Not exact matches
The work, published in Science, not only opens the door to expand the use of one of the most
efficient energy sources on the planet, but also adds a key step in completing the
nuclear fuel cycle — an advance, along with wind and solar, that could help power the world's energy needs cleanly for the future.
Appropriators in the Senate, meanwhile, endorsed plans for a center dedicated to the modeling and simulation of
nuclear reactors, and gave qualified support to two more: A hub to make
fuels directly from sunlight and another on energy -
efficient buildings.
Concerns about global warming and oil's imminent demise have caused scientists and policy - makers to look for solutions in both the future and the past: to new technologies such as
nuclear fusion, multijunction photovoltaics, and
fuel cells — and to traditional energy sources such as water power, wind power, and (sustainable) biomass cultivation (coupled with clean and energy -
efficient combustion).
There are several reasons for this: the contraction of energy - intensive heavy industries, such as iron and steel; the long - term malaise in the national economy; the modest move away from burning fossil
fuels that produce carbon dioxide towards
nuclear energy; and the increasingly
efficient use of energy evident in most of the economies of the rich world.
Among Freeman's specific recommendations are a «20 percent federal tax credit to electricity and natural gas utilities that gives highest priority to the
efficient use of the energy they supply,» and ban on new coal or
nuclear plants and retirement of the existing plants within the next 30 years, government - funded demonstration plants for Big Solar and hydrogen, increasing federal
fuel economy standards one mile - per - gallon a year over the next 24 years, tax credits for plug - in hybrids or flex -
fuel vehicles, and an excess - profits tax on oil to fund the tax credits.
Unlike the current generation of light - water
nuclear reactors, PRISM uses metallic
fuel, such as an alloy of zirconium, uranium, and plutonium, and PRISM's
fuel rods sit in a bath of a liquid metal — sodium — at atmospheric pressure, which ensures that the transfer of heat from the metal
fuel to the liquid sodium coolant is extremely
efficient.
GE Hitachi
Nuclear Energy (GEH) believes that PRISM offers the most efficient, clean, cost - effective option for turning nuclear waste into low carbon energy; while also managing used nuclear fuel and surplus plutonium by converting it into elect
Nuclear Energy (GEH) believes that PRISM offers the most
efficient, clean, cost - effective option for turning
nuclear waste into low carbon energy; while also managing used nuclear fuel and surplus plutonium by converting it into elect
nuclear waste into low carbon energy; while also managing used
nuclear fuel and surplus plutonium by converting it into elect
nuclear fuel and surplus plutonium by converting it into electricity.
The Council of the American Physical Society believes that the use of renewable energy sources, the adoption of new ways of producing and using fossil
fuels, increased consideration of safe and cost effective uses of
nuclear power, and the introduction of energy -
efficient technologies can, over time, promote the United States» energy security and reduce stress on the world's environment.
The first three Hubs were for energy
efficient buildings,
nuclear reactors, and
fuels from sunlight.
J&D also note that by transitioning to more
efficient technologies (for example, battery electric vehicles over the internal combustion engine, electric heat pumps for homes, and solar thermal energy with storage to provide baseload power rather than fossil
fuels and
nuclear) we can actually reduce global power production by 30 % compared to business - as - usual.
Friends of the Earth Europe is calling for a just transition to a 100 % renewable, no
nuclear, super energy -
efficient, zero - fossil -
fuel Europe.
It's a taster of the diverse groups and individuals behind the movement for a future free from fossil
fuels, and an introduction to our Fossil Free Europe campaign, calling for a just transition to a 100 % renewable, no
nuclear, super energy -
efficient, zero - fossil -
fuel Europe by 2030.
This means urgently and drastically increasing current EU targets to tackle climate change and ensuring a just transition to a 100 % renewable, no
nuclear, super energy -
efficient, zero - fossil -
fuel Europe by 2030.
This mechanism is similar to a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), but allows for a broader set of qualified sources; not only renewables, but also
nuclear power, fossil
fuel power with carbon capture and storage (CCS), and — in principle —
efficient natural gas.
The scenario combines the following elements:
efficient electricity end - use; hydroelectric power;
nuclear power;
efficient gas turbine technologies fired with natural gas; use of coal - derived hydrogen in
fuel cells; and biomass - integrated gasifier / gas turbine technologies.
In other side events of note, a roundtable titled «The Role of Cleaner and More
Efficient Fossil
Fuels and
Nuclear Power in Climate Mitigation» organised by the US delegation drew hundreds of attendees.
A country using
nuclear energy is therefore rated as a country using gas, the most
efficient fossil
fuel.
Replacement of the current thermal variety of
nuclear fission reactors with
nuclear fission fast reactors, which are 100 times more
fuel efficient, can dramatically extend
nuclear fuel reserves.
CCS offers the opportunity to meet climate change objectives while providing energy security, as part of a portfolio of options including energy efficiency, renewable energy,
nuclear energy, more
efficient coal technologies and
fuel switching from coal to gas.
Important to note is the comprehensive breadth of sectors that fall under the «new energy» concept - its not just renewables such as wind, solar and biomass, but also energy efficiency,
nuclear, smart (and strong) grid, transportation, unconventional natural gas, and more
efficient use of fossil
fuels.
Both new Innovation Hubs are in addition those for developing new ideas for converting
fuels from sunlight, advanced
nuclear energy modeling, and energy
efficient building design technologies.
The most water -
efficient energy sources are natural gas (though we may be just about out of it) and synthetic
fuels produced by coal gasification; the least
efficient are ethanol and biodiesel — the biofuels just can't catch a break these days, can they?Water use winners and losers The research pair analyzed 11 types of energy sources, including coal,
fuel ethanol, natural gas, and oil; and five power generating methods, including hydroelectric, fossil
fuel thermoelectric, and
nuclear methods; in terms of power generation, Younos and Hill have found that geothermal and hydroelectric energy types use the least amount of water, while
nuclear plants use the most.