The author claims that ITSSD's analyses were an
effort to inject «rational
discourse into the heated emotional and ideological debate that Baby Milk Action has fomented, with the help of local UN agency offices, to frighten the
public into believing what the organization and the UN wishes them to believe.»
Rather, ITSSD's publishing of its analyses was an
effort to inject rational
discourse into the heated emotional and ideological debate that Baby Milk Action has fomented, with the help of local UN agency offices, to frighten the
public into believing what the organization and the UN wishes them to believe.