Sentences with phrase «egalitarian communitarians»

is he supposed to be counteracting defensive resistance among egalitarian communitarians to evidence that the impact of rising CO2 concentrations won't necessarily precipitate enviornmentally dangerous global warming?

But part of the reason that polarization was lower in the geoengineering condition was that egalitarian communitarians who read the geoengineering news story reacted less open - mindedly toward the climate - change study than their counterparts who first read the anti-pollution news story.

meanings that egalitarian communitarians attach to climate change risks made the egalitarian communitarian subjects (in both national samples) become more dismissive of climate change evidence.»»

In sum, by inverting the cultural meanings attached to such evidence, the geoengineering news story made the hierarchical individualists more inclined to believe and egalitarian communitarians more inclined to be skeptical of climate change.

«But the conflict between those meanings and the narrative implicit in the «geoengineering» condition woke the egalitarian communitarians up to the study's potential policy implications: if CO2 reductions won't be enough to stave off disaster, then we are going to have to do something more.»

-- geoengineering could well expected to provoke a skeptical orientation in egalitarian communitarians, not only toward geoengineering but toward climate change science that implies the necessity and feasibility of conscious interventions to offset the impact of carbon emissions on the environment.

«Egalitarian communitarians,» by the same logic, readily embrace the most dire climate - change forecasts because they perceive exactly the same thing but take delight at the prospect of radical limits on commerce, industry, and markets, which in their eyes are the source of myriad social inequities.

Second, the egalitarian communitarians in the geoengineering condition were less open - minded in their assessment of climate change evidence than those in the anti-pollution condition.

The egalitarian communitarians in the anti-pollution conditon saw no tension between — indeed, likely perceived an affinity between — the dire conclusions of the study and the «game over!»

There is no meaningful difference between whte males and others for «egalitarian individualists» and «egalitarian communitarians.»

One could imagine a world in which crediting evidence of human - caused climate change and the risks it poses gratify hierarchical and individualistic sensibilities and threaten egalitarian communitarian ones.

-- many egalitarian communitarian subjects pushed back on the premise, either adopting or rejecting with less vehemence the dismissive responses that climate skeptics typically express toward evidence of human - caused climate change.

Not exact matches

For example, recent experiments with new patterns of authority seem to show, just as did similar communitarian experiments in the 19th century, that the more egalitarian the group, the more ephemeral it is.

This liberalism is defined by its vision of society as a contract among naturally free and equal persons, and its antitypes are communitarian visions of the left (socialist, egalitarian community) and of the right (traditional, hierarchical, moralistic community).

Rather, my point (made clear by succeeding paragraphs) is that we should not take new communitarians seriously when they claim they are merely reinforcing existing egalitarian values.

Yet, the relational conception of power is a nonhierarchical, communitarian, egalitarian, democratic, and participatory vision applicable to every dimension of reality.

As we shall see in the next chapter, the process - relational vision is profoundly democratic, communitarian, egalitarian, and participatory.

One set of stats that didn't make it into my piece: 78 per cent of subjects who display an «egalitarian» and «communitarian» worldview believe that most scientists agree climate change is happening (which is true)-- compared with only 19 per cent of those with a «hierarchical» and «individualist» worldview.

Of course, liberal - egalitarian - communitarian males are no less prone to cognitive biases and group - think than conservative - hierarchical - individualistic ones.

Subjects holding hierarchical and individualistic outlooks, on the one hand, and ones holding egalitarian and communitarian outlooks, click me for a closer look!on the other, significantly disagreed about the state of expert opinion on climate change, nuclear waste disposal, and handgun regulation.

We found, not surprisingly, that subjects disposed toward hierarchical and individualistic values — in both the U.S. and the English samples — were highly dismissive, while ones disposed toward egalitarian and communitarian values were highly receptive to the evidence presented in the composite study.

Precisely the opposite happened with the other group — «egalitarian - communitarians» or liberals — who tended to worry more as they knew more science and math.

Likewise, a liberal with distrust of big business is inclined to oppose genetically modified organisms, not necessarily because of evidence, but because GMOs are often developed and sold by big corporations, which are seen as incongruent with egalitarian and communitarian mindset.

The more liberal respondents tended to adopt opinions that support an egalitarian and communitarian framework.

In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them.