Punitive damages are also available in many jurisdictions to punish defendants in those cases involving particularly
egregious conduct which demonstrates a reckless or wanton disregard for the safety of the public.
Not exact matches
Congress,
which has voted the funds for these agencies (NASA and NOAA, for instance), must be held responsible to subpoena the agency officials and records and to see to it that the culpable individuals are fired and prosecuted for their
egregious criminal
conduct.
On appeal the Cains argued that the trial court erred by giving Instruction 10
which included language that noted «punitive damages are generally not favored and should be awarded only in cases involving
egregious conduct.»
The Virginia Supreme Court agreed with their position and noted that the code section upon
which the instruction was based did not include the necessity that the jury find that the
conduct was «
egregious.»
Punitive Damages — Punitive damages are available in cases in
which the
conduct of the defendant is established to have been particularly
egregious.
If the party responsible for an individual's catastrophic injuries engaged in especially
egregious conduct, such as drunk driving, violent assault, very dangerous business practices, concealing known dangers from the public, or other grossly negligent or misleading behavior, the court may even find that the responsible party owes punitive damages,
which are meant to punish the wrongdoer and deter future bad
conduct.
For a proprietary claim to succeed, and irrespective of how
egregious is the defendant's
conduct, the defendant must have either assets of the claimant or assets
which are substitutes of the assets the defendant appropriated.