Sentences with phrase «egregious flaw»
The most egregious flaw of the interior is the very large «Corvette» stitched across the dash in front of the passenger.
http://www.automobilemag.com/
Surviving Mars isn't a bad game — how can it be, when its most egregious flaw is its willingness to be merely competent.
«For years, I have proposed closing the LLC loophole - one of the most egregious flaws in our campaign finance system - and every year the bill has stalled.»
«For years, I have proposed closing the LLC loophole — one of the most egregious flaws in our campaign finance system — and every year the bill has stalled.»
The results of the remaining studies were to be disregarded due to egregious flaws in design and execution.
«Math Consultant: Smarter Balanced Math Tests Have «Egregious Flaws» Main Duncan on Standards, ESEA, and Why He Avoided PARCC Protesters»
iBooks does some things far better than the Kindle app — but it also includes some simply egregious flaws.
I intend both to «follow the money» (flowing primarily from special interests opposed to regulation or taxation of greenhouse gas emissions) and to «follow the science» (by exposing the most egregious flaws in the «evidence» against the attribution of contemporary climate change primarily to human causes).
Not exact matches
The ultimate consequence of this flaw was the egregious miscalculation of the «exodus,» the walkout by students and faculty.
As much as the bible has factual errors in it, the moral and ethical flaws are much more plentiful and egregious.
The most egregious problems occur on track, and the fundamentally flawed penalty system is an especially annoying one.
Her post has several flaws in it, the largest and most egregious one of which is that Rusch was ALREADY A PUBLISHED AUTHOR when she started self - publishing, so really, her saying «just publish books and don't promote them» has a completely different meaning for her.
Long - awaited sequels to beloved franchises that left a rotten taste in most peoples» mouths with their last few entries, and all these people really want to like these new sequels, and the studios / producers really want them to like them as well, so they churn out these super-safe, checklist - following, assembly line products that, in spite of some obvious flaws, don't have anything particularly egregious about them, resulting in an excessively warm response.
Indeed, the egregious attack by Trenberth et al. on the paper by Spencer & Braswell cites no flaw in that paper and the journal which published it has refused to withdraw it.
Further, in describing flaws in the data the EEOC's expert Kevin Murphy relied upon to support the disparate impact claim, the Judge labeled these reports as 1) «laughable»; 2) «based on unreliable data»; 3) «rife with analytical error»; 4) containing «a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies,» and a «mind - boggling number of errors»; 5) «completely unreliable»; 6) «so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded»; 7) «distorted»; 8) «both over and under inclusive»; 9) «cherry - picked»; 10) «worthless»; and 11) «an egregious example of scientific dishonesty.»