But when Wahl and Ammann say — our model doesn't work without Graybill bristlecone chronologies, ergo they contain «valid» information at the «
eigenvector level», no one in the «community» says boo to a goose.
Not exact matches
I've taught college
level mathematics for almost 40 years, including the linear algebra used to find the
eigenvectors.
Its easy to demonstrate with synthetic examples that the selection criteria are a function of the centering convention and that different conventions do lead to different estimated
eigenvector cutoff
levels.
For instance, the results obtained in Forest 2006 appear to be sensitive to the weighting applied to the upper air data by pressure
level, as well as to the upper air diagnostic
eigenvector truncation parameter.