The NFA was the first financial regulatory organization to
accept claims in this way.
So, knowing how easy it is to fool people with a false claim of being nonfiction, you expect me to just
accept the claim of the Bible when you'd think me a fool for accepting a similar claim by any other book?
I can not determine anything that is first person, and you very well may have good justified reasons for your belief, and all I can say is that I don't have evidence to justify
accepting the claim.
outside of the bible, or any other religious texts (which, again, are only relevant to
those accept the claimed authority) do you see any evidence of heaven, hell, sin, or redemption?
You make the claim that there is a god, I say I don't
accept your claim due to the lack of evidence provided... seems to me the one making the claim is the one who needs to provide the evidence.
The atonement of the world is anticipated, Pannenberg says, in that those who
accept the claim of the Cross and live for the unity that it promises are free to live at one with God and neighbor.
While Evangelicals greatly respect the way in which the Catholic Church has defended many historic Christian teachings against relativizing and secularizing trends, and recognize the role of the present pontiff in that important task today, they believe that some aspects of Catholic doctrine are not biblically warranted, and they do not
accept any claims of infallibility made for the magisterial teachings of popes or church councils.
So without using your buybull provide the evidence... give us reason to
accept your claim!
S.Lewis» «I am here trying to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: «I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't
accept his claim to be God.»
A person falls prey to this fallacy if
he accepts a claim as being true simply because most other people approve of the claim.
In today's cultural and political climate, however, to suggest that the current stampede to
accept claims that a decade ago would have been regarded as signs of serious psychological disturbance — and that are still regarded as such by eminent psychiatrists — is to risk being shamed and cast to the margins of society as a bigot.
Even if one
accepts the claim that memory is an experience of the past, this is rather like saying that if we define dog as a four - legged mammal, then all horses are dogs.
It would still not be rational to
accept this claim simply because most people approved of it.
I accept his claim to being Christian on the same basis as I do yours.
I have grown convinced that more often than not it is sheer ignorance, sheer lack of study of the actual records, which makes clever as well as foolish men say, «Well, of course, he was a great teacher, but I can not
accept the claim that he was divine.»
«Considering the number of boys who were educated at St Peter's, the Verona Fathers absolutely do not
accept that claims from 12 individuals demonstrate a culture of abuse at the seminary.»
It accepts the idea that there is no pure observation language, but it does not
accept the claim that theories are incommensurable.
For anyone who is not already predisposed to believing that the imaginary is real, if his attention is called to the distinction between reality and imagination and he is explicitly reminded that the imaginary is not real, he's not likely to
accept claims about imaginary things as truth.
If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have
accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.
One need not
accept those claims, but one must help readers to understand them.
Atheists do not
accept these claims, which would mean; No to theist claims.
Believers claiming to have a real, bona fide god to worship have to provide proof to those of us not willing to
accept that claim blindly.»
Specifically, I have ventured to challenge both of the simplifications whereby the problem before us is most commonly rendered incapable of solution — namely, the simplifications that one can be truly secular only by accepting modern secularism and that one can believe in God only by
accepting the claims of classical theism.
JB Why should
I accept the claim that your God gives us all these things and not someone's claim that their god is responsible?
Makes no authoritative claim but rejects the claim of god Gnostic Theist = Says there is a god Agnostic Theist = Makes no authoritative claim but
accepts the claim of god
Nevertheless, by reading the Genesis account and by also
accepting the claim hesitantly that Muslims are the descendants of Ismael, the verses you have cited is indeed intriguing!!
Honestly, I have no reason to doubt that President Obama sincerely embraces Christianity, although I disagree with him on key issues within the faith and politics, issues that I think are reflected in doubt and a hesitance to
accept his claim amongst evangelicals.
Your bar of
accepting claims is quite a bit lower than mine...
I see no reason to
accept the claims about God in the Bible as more accurate than any other holy book's claims about it's gods.
To expect others to
accept your claim of knowledge without verifiable evidencial support is arrogant.
I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: «I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't
accept His claim to be God.»
Obviously, to
accept the claims and the promises of Christ is to set out in a new direction.
Even if I did, I doubt you would
accept that claim.
The vast majority of atheists are atheist because they simply do not
accept the claim that god exists.
So, don't claim that God doesn't exist, as they want you to, just say that you don't
accept their claim that he does.
We can not claim, nor
accept the claim that god definitely does not exist for the very reasons we can not
accept the claim that he does: lack of evidence and an inability to verify said claim.
Frs Hanvey and Carroll accept that it can not be applied «completely», but it surely can not be applied at all, if one
accepts the claims of the Church and the teaching authority of Jesus Christ.
In particular he seeks to convince his readers that there is good evidence to
accept the claims of the New Testament.
But the time to positively believe a claim is when there is proper foundation to
accept the claim.
Only if
you accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.
If you can't, then there is no reason for anyone to
accept your claim that YOUR God exists.
Does that mean we should abandon carseats, and
accept the claim that driving without a carseat is safe?
Even if one were to
accept this claim, however, one would have to — as Mr Dayan does — accept that the Palestinians also have this claim, having inhabited the lands for nearly 2,000 years.
After the 2011 elections, he bounced Westminster into
accepting his claim to have a democratic mandate for a referendum.
No 10 backs potty - mouthed defence minister Anna Soubry, saying PM
accepts her claim she did not shout «sanctimonious c ***» at Ed Miliband
According to him, the elephant family should rather come out to either deny or
accept the claim.
«We therefore refused to
accept the claim by Alhaji Garus Gololo (Benue State Chairman of Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association) that Tiv men rustled 1000 Fulani cows and as such they came back killing innocent people in retaliation.
«I am pleased to announce that the V.C.F. is now
accepting claims applications on its website, www.VCF.gov,» said V.C.F. Special Master Sheila Birnbaum in a personal note to survivors announcing the news.
Even if
we accept their claim that engineering graduates are over-represented in the ranks of violent radicals from the Islamic world, it's quite a leap to then assert that «engineers are more likely to have... personality traits that make radical Islamism more attractive».
Should the U.N.
accept their claim — an unlikely possibility, given that they've turned down similar claims from the Russian Bear in the past — Russia would be entitled to thousands of miles of the Arctic Ocean and 45 percent of the area's resources, according to some sources.