And hammer yet another nail into the coffin of Labour's 2020
election chances too.
Not exact matches
But in fact that is
too high a price to pay for giving May and her group of right - wing Tories their only
chance of winning a general
election.
Elections are won on the centre ground, the party has to appear as a competent government - in - waiting, and putting forward anything
too social democratic will kill our
chances.
Four contenders are already gearing up for the fight, unaffected by the short delay in calling the by -
election announced today by the Speaker: the Liberal Democrats, only 103 votes behind Labour in May, are to be challenged by an anti-coalition Liberal, and the Conservatives, 2300 votes behind the Liberals, fancy their
chances too.
If Labour also got rid of Brown, Harman, Balls, Blears, Smith and Watson, they might have a slim
chance at the next
Election too.
With some exceptions, all
too many Americans will quickly betray whatever principles they profess if they think it'll help their preferred political party's
chances in the next
election.
At one point late in the governor's race, the press and interested public paid their obligatory few minutes» worth of attention to Jimmy «Rent Is
Too Damn High» McMillan and a handful of other candidates with zero
chance of
election.
But there are strategic advantages,
too, particularly in
elections where turnout is expected to be light: a
chance to convey a message directly to a captive audience of likely voters at an influential community institution.
In an
election that almost every mainstream media outlet consistently referred to as «
too close to call,» Silver, after Labor Day, never once had Obama's
chances of winning drop below 61.1 %.