The Chamber's 2016
election spending makes it abundantly clear that rather than being a voice for American business, the Chamber has become a very loud, very powerful voice for the Republican Party.
Not exact matches
The Liberals
made a few big - ticket
election campaign
spending promises, but, on the tax side, they also indicated they intend to pad revenues over the next few years with higher tax rates for personal and corporate income.
Abzug's push for Women's Equality Day was, in fact, far more symbolic than many of the more concrete policies she
made a reality in her six years in Congress, not to mention in the two decades prior to her
election, which she
spent as a lawyer fighting for human rights and civil rights.
Collins pointed out that a big part of UK (and indeed US)
election law relates to «declaration of
spent», before
making the conjoined point that if someone is «hiding that
spend» — i.e. by placing dark ads that only the recipient sees, and which can be taken offline immediately after the campaign — it smells like a major risk to the democratic process.
In other words, over the next five years, this government is planning to
spend more money on income splitting for a small number of well off families, a promise
made during the 2011
election, than on supporting economic growth and job creation through new
spending on research and infrastructure and lowering taxes on investment.
With Parliament recessed for the summer and an
election call imminent, all three major political parties will now
spend the coming weeks
making new
election promises.
Manafort's last consulting assignment in Ukraine ended less than six months before he started working for the Trump campaign: He
spent at least a month in Ukraine advising the Opposition Bloc ahead of local
elections in October 2015... In [July], Manafort
made a previously reported effort to patch his soured relationship with [Russian oligarch] Oleg Deripaska,... [and] offered to give private briefings about the campaign to Deripaska.
Presidents or Congresses supposedly stabilize policies in the year leading up to the
election, or cut taxes, or raise
spending, or
make promises, or wave a wand.
Lawmakers no matter the party have been loathe to
make broad - based
spending cuts, especially in an
election year.
The suit, which appears below,
makes reference to the Citizens United case decided by the US Supreme Court earlier this year that enabled corporations and labor unions to
spend much more freely to influence
elections.
The coalition will have to
make spending plans for the 2015/16 financial year, going beyond the 2015 general
election.
The NEA has around 3 million members,
spends quite a bit on lobbying, and
makes substantial contributions directly to
election funds and such (enough to rank as the third largest political donor in the US, according to opensecrets.org).
He can either
make clear to his supporters that there will be no return to the days of lavish
spending, or he can fight an
election knowing that most voters do not believe Labour have learned their lessons, and that many of his potential voters fear Labour would once again borrow and
spend more than the country can afford.
Instead, it's
spent its years in opposition generally opposing the coalition's cuts as a matter of course,
making its commitment to fiscal rectitude just as the
election approaches feel like a late conversion indeed.
He argues that to win the next
election, Ed Miliband needs to
make clear to his supporters that there will be no return to the days of lavish
spending, or fight an
election knowing that most voters do not believe Labour have learned their lessons, and that many of his potential voters fear Labour would once again borrow and
spend more than the country can afford.
Organizations
making independent political expenditures over $ 1,000 would have to disclose the name of the person or group behind the
spending, and report all major contributors (those that donated over $ 1,000) to the Board of
Elections.
26 April 2011 — UGANDA Question: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Verma on 21 March (WA 126 - 7), what assessment they have
made of the allocation of the budget support for Uganda from the United Kingdom, in particular in relation to the increase in
spending by the Government of Uganda prior to the last general
election in that country.
Sky - high contribution limits — $ 41,000 for statewide races in the general
election — mean that candidates
spend more time courting big donors, who in turn exercise disproportionate influence over policy -
making.
AG Schneiderman has proposed requiring the not for profits based in New York to
make public their donors and any money they
spend over $ 10,000 to influence state and local
elections.
[71][87] Support for Labour slumped during the recession, and the general
election of 2010 resulted in a coalition government being formed by the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, which
made deep
spending cuts in order to ease the budget deficit.
According to the statement; «APC is budgeting N7.5 billion, three months allocation of Ekiti State for a mere governorship
election while Fayemi is boasting of having N8 billion his personal money to
spend and N20 billion from the Presidency,
making N35.5 billion?
The Labour council in Sheffield is to reverse # 2m of
spending cuts
made by the Liberal Democrats who ran the authority until May's
elections.
Labour would have
made spending cuts had it won the 2010 general
election - but its past decisions are now seen to be a moot point as the general
election fades into the past.
Trump has said he would appoint justices like Antonin Scalia who opposed Roe vs. Wade, and supported the Citizens United decision that
made it possible for corporations and SuperPACs to
spend unlimited amounts of money on
elections.
We are prepared to raise and
spend what it takes to win this
election and this quarter proved we have the fundraising muscle needed to
make that happen.
According to a filing
made with the state Board of
Elections, Jobs for New York
spent $ 432,000 on air time late last week.
This means the next government, whatever party wins the
election, will have to
make tough choices on
spending, including
spending on social security.
Instead Brown may play a longer game and gamble that a Tory minority administration
making unpopular
spending cuts during a double - dip recession will rapidly lose support, raising the prospect of fighting an autumn
election with his record for economic competence intact.
He said that he will
spend the last two months before the November general
election talking about «what comes next,» noting that they have the «chance to
make even bigger changes.»
This confirms that the party
made no attempt to stick to its
election pledge to delay
spending cuts until 2011.
Every
election cycle — in every part of the country — AFL - CIO unions and unaffiliated labor organizations
make pragmatic calculations about who to endorse and
spend money on.
You may recall he was the Conservative MP who was ruthlessly sacked by Michael Howard just before the 2005
election for
making some unhelpful comments about the prospects for
spending cuts.
The DSCC's unusually heavy
spending against Sestak can be attributed in part to the belief among some party leaders that he would
make a weak general
election candidate against Republican incumbent Sen. Patrick J. Toomey.
And so the Tories will
spend the final week of their
election campaign on Brexit - trying to talk it up,
making it out to be the great national project of the next five years rather than the enormous looming omnishambles it actually is.
Of course a shadow Chancellor can not, more than 3 years from the next
election,
make any detailed
spending commitments — nor would he be expected to — but, if pressed, he could certainly
make clear his intention to redress the worst of the cuts as soon as the economic situation allowed.
In the most recent
election there, charter school supporters and labor unions collectively
spent $ 15 million trying to elect their allies,
making it the most expensive school board
election in United States history, according to The Los Angeles Times.
SANDERS: And then, to
make a bad situation worse, we have a corrupt campaign finance system where millionaires and billionaires are
spending extraordinary amounts of money to buy
elections.
Outlining the city's new
spending initiatives, including investments in public safety, education, anti-homelessness services, transportation, infrastructure and the Board of
Elections, Fuleihan said the executive budget, «
makes investments that address longstanding structural issues that affect all New Yorkers.»
The Board of
Elections requires political clubs that raise or
spend money for candidates to register and to
make disclosures.
Tories fear Ukip could
make capital out of any perception that England will lose out if Scotland gains the power to set its own
spending, taxes and welfare policy — or so - called devo max — in return for staying in the UK, ahead of a potentially damaging by -
election in Clacton next month.
«I believed that if we
made a principled case for ruling out a VAT rise, as well as against premature cuts in public
spending, it would change the course of the
election,» said Mr Balls.
«I can tell you I'm going to
spend a lot of time between
Election Day and January 1
making sure everybody who signs the pledge to pass the Women's Equality Agenda recommits and recommits,» the former Council speaker told Capital, alluding to her surrogate role for the governor on women's issues.
Tenney, a member of the state Assembly until she won the 22nd Congressional District
election last year, has been a frequent critic of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's
spending on discretionary projects and the lack of public input into the decision -
making process.
But Cameron's admission that the Tories
made the same arguments about tax and
spend in the 2005
election risks trapping them in a boring, static and ultimately unwinnable debate based on Government numbers: x billion tax cuts «paid for» by y billion
spending cuts.
Vince Cable warned before the
election that «the danger of drastic cuts in public
spending right now is that it would
make the recession worse and it would
make the deficit worse» — but he signed up to them.
In August 2014, Connor told the Daily News that the IDC Initiative was in the process of re-registering with the state Board of
Elections as an independent expenditure committee, a change that would allow it to
spend unlimited sums as long as its
spending decisions were
made independently of candidates» campaigns.
Half or more agreed with the statements that Mr Cameron is «too keen» on staying in the EU; refuses to «shake up the Westminster clique»; has lost control of the UK's borders; should cut both
spending and tax; and should bring in new laws to
make it easier for voters to sack MPs in between general
elections.
«CCHQ accepted in March 2016 that it had
made an administrative error by not declaring a small amount constituting 0.6 % of our national
spending in the 2015
election campaign.
Dozens of Conservative MPs expect to learn shortly whether they will be charged with fraud in relation to their
spending at the last
election, as deadlines for the Crown Prosecution Service to
make a decision approaches.
The winnings might well be enough to finance the
election campaign and
make up some of the difference between what the Tories will
spend.