Sentences with phrase «elections people do»

«In by - elections people do want to send you a message and I do take that seriously.
But at the time of the next election people do remember such instances and also remember who was responsible.

Not exact matches

He said during the run - up to the 2016 presidential election that «good people don't smoke marijuana» and called it a «real danger.»
«I think (Prime Minister Alexis) Tsipras will lose (the election), because I think we Greeks become resentful to the people that promised things and didn't manage to deliver,» Hatzi said.
«When you consider this survey went out a few days after the election and an election that to all pundits was a surprise and provided results people didn't expect, I wonder over time whether the exuberance may dissipate,» Wynn said.
«I am hoping there were special factors that caused people to be pessimistic [after the election] that will be resolved next time we do the survey,» Bernstein says.
Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters make decisions based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do think that there is a certain profound lack of empathy in asserting that the only reason that some of them are voting the way they did is because they saw some fake news.
In every election around the world, we keep improving our tools to help more people register and vote, and we hope to eventually enable hundreds of millions of more people to vote in elections than do today, in every democratic country around the world.
The report, from 2012, did not claim that those people voted illegally in an election, as it was written as an argument for modernizing the US voting system.
We expect just a bunch of people mostly living in a suburb in Northern California [to] safeguard U.S. elections in 2018, not cause ethnic cleansing in Myanmar, not help Duterte kill off people he doesn't like in Philippines, not kill off media companies by mistake in Serbia, and a few more.»
To win a presidential election, Republicans count on the fact that Democrat - leaning young people historically do not vote.
On a range of questions — such as whether Harper is doing a good job, is representing the «values» of people, and should run again in the 2015 election, the prime minister has support levels among Canadians that exceed 40 per cent.
But it did acknowledge it was «possible» that parent company SCL «sent one or more persons abroad to help in elections in a non-strategic role, but on incorrect visas.»
While our Board does not anticipate that any of the director nominees will be unable to stand for election as a director nominee at our Annual Meeting, if that occurs, proxies will be voted in favor of such other person or persons as may be recommended by our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and designated by our Board.
The Justice Department on Friday handed down indictments to 13 Russian people and three Russian companies for meddling in United States political and election processes, the latest item in a litany of evidence that Russia, well, did it.
Certainly this is a conversation where everyone has more to lose; those scapegoating Facebook probably don't want to think about their own responsibility, such that it may be, for an election result they disagree with, and the stakes are even higher for Facebook: giving people what they want to see is far more important to the company's business model than $ 100,000 in illegal ads, unintended consequences or not.
SEAN HANNITY: My question is, are you concerned within the process of this, we did discover that a foreign national, Christopher Steele, was paid through Fusion GPS, used Russian sources that not only weren't verified, but were debunked — are you concerned that was paid for, to manipulate the American people in the lead - up to an election?
-- Five people have done six stints as communications director since Trump won the 2016 election, serving an average of 70 days.
The firm was due to stop paying Steele as Election Day approached, but Steele felt his work was not done, these people said.
Roger: I think some of the reflections of the elections around the world have to do with dissatisfaction from people who may have had a lifestyle that existed in the 1970s that no longer exists as a result of a lot of these changes that we are talking about, so I think that's potential ramifications that could stifle.
«We didn't focus enough on preventing abuse and thinking through how people could use these tools to do harm as well, and that goes for fake news, foreign interference in elections, hate speech, in addition to developers and data privacy.»
All the controversy that lead to this belief is convincing people to believe otherwise, but the French election result did not lead to the Euro becoming weaker.
Its News Feed algorithm, which determines what people see and don't see in their feed, was gamed to help spread misinformation ahead of last fall's U.S. election.
For me as a Calvinist, that suggests that rather than spending a lot of time defending the doctrine of total depravity or of election I would do best to share my deeply felt sense of my own unworthiness, and to point people to the way in which I have experienced God's gracious workings in my life.
Election time does funny things to people of all faiths...
A lot of people who believe in the individual election to eternal life view say they do not believe in double predestination because of how repulsive it is, but to me, it seems the logical conclusion.
This is partly because it is difficult to view recent elections as truly democratic, and partly because Russia does not have a civic tradition that regards the will of the people as a convincing mandate.
It's hard to imagine how so many people don't understand that by the nature of our representation and elections we have a two party system which only legislation is likely to change.
Many people find more meaning in city councils and voting for school boards than they do for national elections, but they all say local politics make them more passionate about politics in general.
More people died at their hands than the aztecs sacrificed over a 50 year period 7) The fall of the soviet union was more an economic fall than anything, and this is the first time I have ever heard the election of a pope had anything to do with it.
The majority of the electorate simply do not share their views so try as they might every time, someone running on the platform to outlaw abortion or make gay people bad, etc. will just not win in the general election, period.
For such personalism (if it may be so called) does not exclude a «democratic» election of these ministers and does not, in principle, prejudice a cooperation in their decisions by the whole people of God or individual groups.
IT does NOT translate into that person's populatiry in a general election.
Through the nucleus that does not betray the election, the living connection between God and the people is upheld, and from their midst will arise «the perfected one.»
The sense of the prophetic ethic and morality is always something like this: «You shall refrain from this practice, or you shall do thus - and - so, because I am Yahweh who brought you up out of Egypt [election] and you are a people voluntarily committed in return to the performance of my just and righteous will [covenant].»
The Israelite who did not joyfully rest from his work on that day was one who put his hope in his own work rather than in God's election.22 According to de Quervain,»... when our minds are illumined by faith, we see the Sabbath in Israel as grounded not in a sociological event, but in a theological one, the deliverance of God's people from bondage into the rest which he gave them as a token of the final rest.
In the American constitutional order the people do that through debate, elections, and representative political institutions.
And if Mr. Nixon's attempt to steal the 1972 election did not shake them, it certainly shook their children, the people born since World War II.
His tax plans would be poisonous in the general election, he spouts off in ways that people who are not already his supporters find ludicrous, and his political organization more resembles a scheme to amass a post-election fundraising list than it does a campaign designed to win.
Now I don't care if a person (if you can call a policitan a person) wants to beleive in whatever he / she chooses but just why is religion mentioned all the time during elections, etc..
We're in the middle of a presidential election, if you've not noticed, featuring two candidates a lot of people don't want.
The facts which our incipient, embryonic democracy must face are more staggering than the old tyrants were — for example, that at the last presidential election almost twenty - eight million people who were qualified to vote did not exercise that privilege; that an accredited estimate is possibly true that in the United States four million people are living in destitution.
Election has to do with God's people, predestination deals with God's purposes.
What this means is that election has nothing to do with who has eternal life and who does not, and everything to do with God's choice of certain people and nations to perform certain tasks and purposes in He plan for the world.
So you see that even with the people of Israel, election does not mean that God decides to give eternal life to some people.
If the prophets speak on behalf of social and economic justice, they do not preach a general abstract morality, but pointedly and specifically proclaim an election / covenant ethic, the sense of which is something like this: You shall refrain from this practice, or you shall do thus - and - so, because I am Yahweh who brought you up out of Egypt (election) and you are a people voluntarily committed in return to the performance of my righteous will (covenant).
There was a reason why the founding fathers put kept religion out of our government and now it seems we are being asked to» pick the Christian» in this next years election — we are not picking the leader of a church here people, we picking someone to be the most influential, most powerful person on the earth... do we want someone who has our best interests at heart or someone who will time and again try to change the US laws to reflect his own personal beliefs?
If they did why, during this last election cycle did I hear every single religious person, more so Evangelicals telling me how much they HATE Obama.
One of the questions put to the respondents focused on the doctrine of Israel's election: «In what sense do you believe that the Jews are the chosen people of God?»
I know lots of people who don't know anything about Romney other than he was for the rich, tax cuts, and he was trying to take advantage of a lousy economy to win an election.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z