When no candidate candidate achieves the 270 threshold, the 50 state delegations in the House are to choose between the top three
electoral vote winners which would include the winner of the single district.
Not exact matches
OTTAWA — Nine million
votes were wasted in the 2015 election under Canada's
winner - take - all
electoral system — that's more than the populations of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the Atlantic provinces combined, according to a new
electoral reform primer outlining why the principle of proportionality must underpin the government's promise to bring in
voting reform by the next federal election.
Recent stark examples of the absurdity in a «
winner - takes - all» system occurred in Florida and New Mexico during the 2000 presidential election when candidate George W. Bush won both states by a fraction of a percentage point, but gained the total number of each state's
electoral votes.
By contrast, the unit rule (by which states award all their
electoral votes to the plurality
winner in the state) that 48 states employ under the
electoral college encourages third parties, especially regional candidates like Strom Thurmond in 1948 or George Wallace in 1968.
CES: A lot of the
electoral systems in the US rely on
winner - take - all, which sort of directly bars out proportional
voting methods.
Maine and Nebraska both award their
electoral college
votes according to the
winner of each of their congressional districts.
If one state becomes in doubt and unresolvable, the
winner will still have 270
electoral votes, so the outcome will remain unaffected.
If 3 - 4 states become in doubt and unresolvable, enough that the
winner no longer has 270
electoral votes, the US House of Representatives gets to pick, and it's likely they will choose their own party's candidate.
However,
electoral laws demand that the
winner gain more than 50 % of the
vote, which none of the eight original contestants managed to achieve.
Awarding Connecticut's
electoral votes to the
winner of the national popular
vote may disenfranchise a majority of the individual voters in our state.
«The provisions of the constitution and the
electoral act are clear to the effect that with the unfortunate death of Prince Abubakar Audu before the conclusion of the election, and the fact that the laws do not permit the replacement of candidates once the balloting has commenced, the APC crashed out of the race, leaving the PDP candidate, Governor Idris Wada as the clear
winner, having garnered 204,877
votes to top all other contestants since, Prince Ababakar, the hitherto leading contestant died with his
votes.
Since the
electoral college had already
voted for the
winner and the President had already inaugurated, what would happen since the Constitution doesn't state anything (as far as I recall)?
State - by - state
winner - take - all laws to award
electoral college
votes were eventually enacted by 48 states AFTER the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution.
I threw it in a spreadsheet, and the
winner of the thirty - one places with the fewest
votes per
electoral college
vote loses the popular
vote by about 79.6 % to 20.4 %.
Callaghan and Foot had conceded the principle of a wider «
electoral college» in which the unions would have 40 % of the
votes (then cast in
winner - takes - all union blocs), and the parliamentary party (PLP) and activists 30 % each.
Absent a precedent - shattering event when the
electoral college
votes, the apparent
winner of the general election will be the next President.
However, two states (Maine and Nebraska) award an
electoral vote to the
winner of each district in the state in addition to one for the overall
winner, so it should be possible for every numeric combination to happen.
Table 2 (a): Number of
electoral college
votes that would have been won by each candidate if these had been apportioned proportionally (PrEV), as contrasted with the number won by each candidate in the actual election («
winner takes all» /» first past the post»).
The head of The Gambia's
electoral commission declared Adama Barrow, 51, as the
winner of the 2016 presidential election, with 263,515
votes to Yahya Jammeh's 212,099
votes.
Because in a «
winner takes all»
electoral system like that in the US and the UK, not all
votes are created equal.
4... unfortunately, the poll didn't predict the
winner, because Jackson didn't get enough
votes in the
electoral college.
This is a
winner - take - all system, whereby the candidate who wins the popular
vote within a state garners all of the
electoral college
votes, even if one candidate wins a razor - thin popular
vote victory over his or her rival.
On a state level, each contest is a
winner take all affair; with only Maine and Nebraska allowing for a split share of
electoral votes.