Not exact matches
But black
votes for Obama were inconsequential in preventing Alabama's nine
electoral votes from being delivered to John McCain and Mitt Romney, both of whom defeated Obama in that
state with 60 % of the
vote.
Black migrants from the South fanned out to cities across the Midwest and Northeast — St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Philadelphia, New York — in
states that happened to be rich in
electoral votes.
In tandem, the campaign is investing heavily in next - door Pennsylvania, a more Democrat - friendly
state whose 20
electoral votes would make Trump's overall victory all the more unreachable.
Second, the
electoral college got stuck in to provide a last line of defense against public stupidity — in case you didn't know it, the electors aren't legally bound to
vote as their
state's majority has.
While Florida remains the only swing
state that's still too close to call, Obama bested his Republican challenger Mitt Romney regardless, as he raked in at least 303
electoral votes during yesterday's election.
Brandon Watson explains why the National Popular
Vote Interstate Compact --- in which
states assign their
votes in the
electoral college to whoever wins the most
votes countrywide --- is sheer madhattery:
Though its
electoral successes were widespread at the local and
state level the success of the early Socialist Party as a movement with mass was very much linked to the personality of Eugene V. Debs who polled nearly a million
votes in the presidential campaign of 1912.
One of the simplest means of dealing with this even retains the
electoral college: have the EC allocate its
votes for each
state proportionately to the
vote, regardless of
electoral district (which also renders gerrymandering almost irrelevant, since the
state is considered as a whole).
In 1788 there were 69 total
electoral votes from 10
states.
For
state D, with its 4
votes in the
electoral college, there are two ways of deciding the coalitions that will not see it win:
Despite not getting a majority, the Republicans would still get all six
electoral votes from that
state.
Define a coalition as winning if the total number of
electoral votes of the
state in that coalition is 270 or more (let's ignore at first that two small
states make things more complicated by allowing a mixed elector group).
Let's suppose a smaller country, with 4
states, conveniently named A, B, C, and D, having 1, 2, 3, and 4
votes in that country's
electoral college each respectively.
This kind of landmark judicial pronouncement is understandably rare in every jurisdiction not excluding the most advanced democracies for the obvious reason that it has always been considered prudent for the preservation of the
state, democracy and the peace to ensure that proactive mechanisms are put in place before, during and after
voting day to deliver credible
electoral outcomes rather than rely on costly post
electoral judicial reviews.
In the recent 2012 election, if all
states had switched to «proportional» allocation of
electoral votes, what effect would that have had on the outcome?
Several
states have laws that purport to restrict or punish faithless electors for their
electoral votes.
Second, the
electoral college was set up to weed out «unacceptable» candidates not by dividing fringe voters in different
states per se but by giving the electors the power to elect the candidate who lost the popular
vote in the event that the more popular candidate turned out to be unacceptable for whatever reason.
In the last congressional election in Brazil (where all candidates run
state - wide rather than in
electoral districts) the candidate who received the most
votes in the
state of Sao Paulo was a television clown.
Recent stark examples of the absurdity in a «winner - takes - all» system occurred in Florida and New Mexico during the 2000 presidential election when candidate George W. Bush won both
states by a fraction of a percentage point, but gained the total number of each
state's
electoral votes.
For example, three Candidates A, B and C receive 60, 37, and 3 per cent of the popular
vote in
State X. Because
State X has 10
electoral votes, the candidate would receive 6, 4 and 0
electoral votes, respectively (see Table 1).
Although his book centres upon the UK, Goodhart explains that it can also account for the victory of President Trump: Trump consolidated the somewhere
vote in key
electoral college
states.
The constitutionally tortious conduct is not subject to congressional immunity and would be the jettison of Article II of the Constitution by failure to stop and / or object to the counting of
electoral votes for Barack H. Obama who has admitted that at the time of his birth his father was a Kenyan / British citizen and not a citizen of the United
States of America.
Moreover, each and every member of Congress should be notified that he or she is personally liable (can be sued) for his or her own failure, or the same in conspiracy with other members, to perform what is a ministerial and constitutional duty, that is, to require and / or insist that Presidential
electoral votes only be counted for candidates who are «natural born citizens» under Article II of the United
States Constitution, the failure of which creates a cause of action for deprivation of claimants» constitutional rights (as allowed under the Bivens case) against employees of the Federal Government, in this case, to a lawful President and Commander in Chief, and therefore, for deprivation of adequate continuation of the United
States as a Constitutional Republic.
Subsequently,
votes would be distributed to candidates on a proportional basis: candidates would receive a fraction of the
electoral votes of each
state, equivalent to the percentage of the popular
vote they garnered during the election.
It is key to note that not all candidates who run for office will receive
electoral votes, as they will need to meet a popular
vote threshold specific to each
state.
In fact, Democrats have only controlled both chambers twice in the last twenty years (103rd and 110th Congresses) and historical data show that there are thirteen
states that Democrats have not won in the last seven elections,, and five they have only won once, totaling almost 160
electoral votes.
In light of our results, «we recommend that
electoral studies outside the United
States offer respondents face - saving options when asking them to report their
voting behaviour in post-election surveys.»
In addition, under the
electoral college a third party can tip the balance in a closely contested
state by siphoning a few
votes from a major - party candidate.
... Clinton would actually have won a few more
electoral votes in 2016 had all
states used proportional allocation by district (though she'd still fall short of 270).
The US Presidential election uses an «
electoral college» system, where each
state gets a certain number of «electors» (
votes), and those electors cast the official
votes for President.
This is exemplified in Table 2 where a distribution of 57, 37 and 6 per cent in a
state with 10
electoral votes translates into 6, 4 and 1
votes respectively.
On Rivers» general
electoral anarchy: «Shocking cases of cold blooded killings and beheading, obstruction of
votes, arson, voter intimidation, ballot snatching, missing result sheets, presenting of fake ballot papers, multiple thumb - printing, campaigning at polling units, compromise of ad - hoc staffs, absence of level playing environment, violence against media personnel and impunity were witnessed in different magnitude across the length and breadth of the
state.
Bryan - Watson didn't carry any
states, but Watson got 27
electoral votes.
A ghost ballot occurs when three or more candidates receive a percentage of the
vote in a manner that causes the
electoral votes to round up and exceed the allotted
state votes.
Some
states are «proportional», giving a candidate a percentage of
electoral votes based upon their percentage of the popular
vote.
According to its supporters, one of the primary virtues of the
electoral college is that winning candidates must obtainconcurrent majorities from around the country to win, rather than appeal to clusters of voters whose
votes could be aggregated across
states and regions but nevertheless might not represent all strata of society.
That is, let's say that there was a constitutional amendment in place that, instead of abolishing the
electoral college, required that the
votes be split in each
state (somewhat like ME and NE but simpler.)
By contrast, the unit rule (by which
states award all their
electoral votes to the plurality winner in the
state) that 48
states employ under the
electoral college encourages third parties, especially regional candidates like Strom Thurmond in 1948 or George Wallace in 1968.
Those two ways are: (1) small
states have more
electoral votes than big
states relatively to their population, (2) the countries is...
This means that
States are constitutionally mandated to follow Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 (which defines the
electoral college) and the 12th amendment (which amends the
electoral college's
voting process).
Some
states have moved to a more proportional allocation of their
electoral college
votes.
Their agenda includes
electoral reforms like early
voting, a strengthening of the
state abortion laws, creation of a single - payer health care system, criminal justice changes like an end to cash bail, passage of the Child Victims Act, enactment of pro-immigration measures like creation of a
state DREAM Act and the issuance of drivers» licenses to undocumented immigrants.
Subsequently, the joint session of Congress certified the
electoral votes from all 50
states and the District of Columbia.
At the extreme end, Congress might refuse to certify an
electoral college result, so only the other
state votes would count.
The Senate also granted final legislative approval Saturday to a bill allowing Connecticut to join an interstate compact that would ensure the
state's
electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular
vote, provided enough other
states join the agreement.
Maine and one other
state I can't remember (probably NE) divide their
electoral votes based on Senate districting (I believe).
Consider his interactions with the Working Families Party, a homegrown New York third party of unions and liberal groups that, because of the
state's unique fusion
voting system, has become an
electoral powerhouse over the past decade.
Former President Bill Clinton, left, and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo
vote in the
state's
electoral college at the Senate chamber in Albany on Dec. 19, 2016.
The number of
electoral votes for each
state may change whenever there is a Census and reapportionment of congressional districts.
This also assumes that A. Each
state hands out
electoral votes using popular
vote, and B.