So, my question reduces to: where can I find the actual cast votes per each state (since the algorithm is validated by the linked answer - winning with a one - vote margin the states with the highest ratio of
electoral votes per capita.)
This is theoretically achievable by winning with a one - vote margin the states with the highest ratio of
electoral votes per capita.
Not exact matches
Inspired after a string of awful - to - middling governors won with less than 50
per cent support, a Maine ballot measure will ask voters to endorse ranked - ballot
voting and instant run - offs — one of the
electoral alternatives the Trudeau government is considering.
Second, the
electoral college was set up to weed out «unacceptable» candidates not by dividing fringe voters in different states
per se but by giving the electors the power to elect the candidate who lost the popular
vote in the event that the more popular candidate turned out to be unacceptable for whatever reason.
For example, three Candidates A, B and C receive 60, 37, and 3
per cent of the popular
vote in State X. Because State X has 10
electoral votes, the candidate would receive 6, 4 and 0
electoral votes, respectively (see Table 1).
This is exemplified in Table 2 where a distribution of 57, 37 and 6
per cent in a state with 10
electoral votes translates into 6, 4 and 1
votes respectively.
With Texas being about 750k
per electoral vote, and Wyoming with a little less than 200k
per vote.
Although it is not regarded as truly proportional by campaigners for
electoral reform, AV is favoured by some because it maintains the constituency link, ensures elected MPs have the support of at least 50
per cent of voters and allows supporters of minority parties to express opinion through their first
vote while giving their second preference to a mainstream party.
Although 40
per cent is regarded as the «election winning» mark, the weighting of the
electoral system means today's poll would result in a hung parliament if translated into
votes.
In summary, if UKIP moved their economic policy to the left, not too far to the left as I mentioned before, just away from the supply side tosh, they could become a major
electoral force and convert those 15 to 17
per cent poll numbers into actual
votes on the ground.
The
electoral body said opposition leader, Mr Charles Brumskine, of the Liberty Party finished third with 149,495
votes constituting 9.6
per cent.
Specificially, it's looking at the case where Evan McMullin (or Gary Johnson) win at least one
electoral vote (which likely means winning Utah or Nevada) and are thus in the list of «the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those
voted for as President» (as
per the 12th).
I have found this Excel file that contains values for 2016 general election and this article that contains
electoral votes breakdown
per state.
It also has the
electoral college
votes per state, but it removes faithless electors for other candidates.
I threw it in a spreadsheet, and the winner of the thirty - one places with the fewest
votes per electoral college
vote loses the popular
vote by about 79.6 % to 20.4 %.
The scale of the left wing MP's victory even surpasses that of Tony Blair's 57
per cent of all
votes cast — albeit under a different
electoral system.
Danny suggested a referendum on the most modest form of
electoral reform - the Alternative
Vote (AV), which allowed candidates to be ranked in preference order and required MPs to secure 50 per cent of the vote to be elected - linked to Lib Dem support for the Conservatives» own reform plan, which was to reduce the number of parliamentary seats and to remove Labour over-representat
Vote (AV), which allowed candidates to be ranked in preference order and required MPs to secure 50
per cent of the
vote to be elected - linked to Lib Dem support for the Conservatives» own reform plan, which was to reduce the number of parliamentary seats and to remove Labour over-representat
vote to be elected - linked to Lib Dem support for the Conservatives» own reform plan, which was to reduce the number of parliamentary seats and to remove Labour over-representation.
The argument of «Labour bias» in the
electoral system is based on arithmetic that shows that Labour receives on average fewer
votes per MP than Lib Dems or Conservatives.
MUF received victory in only 4 of the contested 43
electoral constituencies despite its high
vote share of 31
per cent (this means that its official
vote in the Valley was larger than one - third).
Thus, the South was mostly poorer
per capita to start with, and had a higher share of capitation taxes than it did of Congressional seats and
electoral votes, which was not a recipe for building Congressional support for a major new tax.
He is currently a member of Parliament, a position he was first elected to in 1999 — at the time, his victory (with 92
per cent of the
vote) was considered to be one of the most stunning
electoral victories of the century.