Is there an chance when
the electors come to vote in December, some of them change their idea?
Not exact matches
What they'd probably do is
to vote for their party's presidential candidate, and become «faithless
electors» when it
came to the VP, either abstaining from that
vote, or
voting for a non-Texan (presumably, a different member of their own party) for that office.
For simplicity, I would assume that all
electors are faithful and use 2016 November general election information (registered
votes and turnover), so that I work with realistic figures (especially when it
comes to turnover).
By Thursday, National Review had
come up with the counternarrative
to the sudden anti-Facebook sentiment among progressives this week, pointing out that the Obama administration had been widely lauded during the 2012 election for (in part) using the Facebook profiles of a wide swath of people not just
to predict how they might
vote in the election, but how
to turn those
electors into someone who might
vote for Obama.