Coal is not subject to the vagaries of windless or sunless days, and can easily meet base - load demands of
electricity consumers without interruption.
Not exact matches
Without it, America would have 4.3 million fewer jobs and
consumers would be paying 31 percent more for
electricity and 43 % for gasoline.
A very large portion of
consumers want smart grid applications that will conserve
electricity and lower their bills
without their active involvement.
That means, for a coal plant, we'd have to burn — and so pay for — an extra 10 - 40 % more coal with CCS than we would
without it, and the
electricity from that extra energy / coal consumed is not available to
consumers for
electricity.
The U.S. experience suggests that a more efficient gas market, marked by flexible pricing and fueled by indigenous unconventional resources that are produced sustainably, can reduce coal use, CO2 emissions and
consumers»
electricity bills,
without harming energy security.
Even though people
without electricity access often pay a lot for their energy sources, such as kerosene and candles — sometimes more than they would pay for the same service if they had
electricity access — the upfront costs for off - grid systems may still be higher than most
consumers are willing or able to pay.
Lost in this apparent green energy triumph is one inconvenient truth: California couldn't have doubled renewable
electricity at relatively low cost to
consumers without the advanced hydraulic fracturing techniques — fracking — that came into widespread use a decade ago.
A system based on price - responsive - load would be able to remove this insurance component from at least some of the
electricity supply and thus provide lower prices to
consumers without reducing income to generators.
Electricity planners often confront the energy access gap by increasing supply, without considering how consumers actually use and pay for e
Electricity planners often confront the energy access gap by increasing supply,
without considering how
consumers actually use and pay for
electricityelectricity.
But, one of those policies has been found to treat
consumers of
electricity without solar panels on their roof unfairly.
In recent years, the state of Minnesota has pursued a series of increasingly aggressive renewable energy and «clean energy» policies that cost
electricity consumers billions of dollars,
without achieving its ambitious environmental protection goals.
While China and the U.S. get most of the attention, India - where 300 million people still live
without electricity - is the globe's third greatest emitter of greenhouse gases, and one of the globe's fastest - growing coal
consumers.
They said that the subsidies come at the expense of city dwellers
without solar - ready roofs, low - income
electricity consumers, and investments in other forms of renewable energy.
Committing to a new target to generate 60 % of
electricity via solar power by 2020, and reducing
electricity emissions by 80 %
without putting up the cost of power to
consumers
Without additional fast - response balancing facilities, significant numbers of UK
electricity consumers could regularly experience interruptions or a drop in voltage.»