Solving the Schrödinger equation for the many -
electron wave function has been a key challenge in quantum chemistry for decades.
When the plane wave returns and crosses the molecule, it produces an interference pattern with the stationary part of
the electron wave function, like two trains of water waves crossing and forming a checkerboard disturbance.
Not exact matches
The atom must be considered as a whole (in the
wave -
function of a 2 -
electron atom, even the separate identity of the
electrons is lost).
They have used this technique to precisely tailor the shape of an atomic
electron's
wave function, in effect engineering «designer
wave functions.»
A quantum - style microscope has imaged the hydrogen atom's
wave function, the equation that determines its
electrons» positions — and in turn the atom's properties.
Crucially, the pattern was a projection of the spacings of the energy levels in the hydrogen atom, as laid out in the
wave function, with bright rings where
electrons were present and dark lanes where they were not (Physical Review Letters, doi.org/mmz).
Measuring the position of a single
electron «collapses» the
wave function, forcing it to pick a particular position, but that alone is not representative of its normal, quantum presence in the atom.
The energy loss
function represents the level of interaction between the material and electromagnetic
waves, and is expressed in terms of the change in the amount of energy lost from
electrons and the change in momentum due to corresponding scattering events occurring in the material.
It uses something called the
wave function to describe the system you are studying — an atom, an
electron, whatever — and all the possible ways that system can evolve.
In the above study,
electrons in the conductor are described by the
wave functions of quantum mechanics and the magnetic field is expressed as the U (1) gauge field.
In 1928 English physicist Paul Dirac did that with his equation describing an
electron in terms of both its
wave function (ψ)-- the quantum probability of its being in a particular place — and its mass times the speed of light squared (mc2), a relativistic interpretation of its energy.
The same gauge fixing has been employed in Dr. Koizumi's study on superconductivity, where the gauge fixing is achieved by the energy minimum requirement under the constraint that the
wave function be a single - valued
function of the
electron coordinates.
Then, the duality that the U (1) phase factor can be added to the
wave function as the translational motion of
electrons allows the «time - dependent gauge potential» to emerge.
As is demonstrated by the contrast between the
wave functions of a free
electron and those of a bound
electron, the formation of bonds between particles doesn't so much collapse their
wave function as localize it, by making it energetically improbable that a particle will exist outside a particular well of potential.
Following their 2012 paper, Mayboroda and Filoche looked for ways to extend the landscape
function from mechanical vibrations to the quantum world of
electron waves.
Building on a 1981 proposal by three Russian theorists and more recent work that brought that proposal into the realm of possibility, the team first fired two lasers at hydrogen atoms inside a chamber, kicking off
electrons at speeds and directions that depended on their underlying
wave functions.
So the distribution of
electrons striking the detector matched the
wave function the
electrons had at the moment they left their hydrogen nuclei behind.
When a property of an
electron suddenly switches from possibility to reality, some physicists say its
wave function has collapsed.
Schrödinger's math incorporated a «
wave function» that was great for calculating the expected results of experiments, even though some experiments clearly showed
electrons to be particles.
More precisely, the laser's field drives a small proportion of the
electron's
wave function away and back.
what exactly is it that determines the probability of an energy transition such as an
electron emitting or absorbing a photon (besides densities and occupancies of states and incident photons, etc.)-- and how does refractive index affect this (it has to because the Planck
function is proportional to n ^ 2 — has to be in order to satisfy 2nd law of thermo...)-- and does it make sense to use an k, E diagram when
electrons are not actually propagating as plane
waves — I mean, what is the wavevector when the waveform is not a plane
wave; is k a
function of space in atomic orbitals?