Sentences with phrase «electronic evidence like»

Not exact matches

At the Welsh Liberal Democrat conference in Newport in April the party passed a motion calling for «an individual's free right to use electronic cigarettes where they like to be protected, unless there is evidence to suggest harm is being done to others.»

This is evidenced by publishers like Britannica moving to electronic - only publication.

The most important evidence in many cases consists of electronic items like emails, text messages, computer files, metadata, and databases.

The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-electronic paper record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and inEvidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and inevidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and inevidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.

At the same time, states like California, Colorado and Delaware have made the electronic filing of court documents mandatory, which not only helps drive the reality of the paperless law office forward, but also accounts for why more and more mobile devices are being used in the courtroom to present evidence or advance arguments.

Police will use human and automated surveillance, electronic eavesdropping and interception (wiretaps), real - time location evidence (including tracking devices and cell tower data), forensic evidence like DNA and fingerprints, eyewitness evidence and more.

There was no evidence before me of the practicality of an on - site search for electronic records, an approach that, as a matter of common sense, ought to be possible in a case like this.»

This reminds me of the electronic evidence cases like In Re Vinhnee (US — 9th circ in bankruptcy) where the judge took it upon himself to examine the technical witness of the plaintiff (American Express) and find the explanation of the information security practices inadequate, and as as a result threw out Amex's collection suit against its customer, who had not even bothered to show up.

Very interesting cases like R v Nde Soh, 2014 NBQB 20, which deals with the distinction of «real» versus «documentary» electronic evidence under the Canada Evidence Act, or Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614, which is a nice summation of some principles for BC, are not mentioned in recenevidence under the Canada Evidence Act, or Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614, which is a nice summation of some principles for BC, are not mentioned in recenEvidence Act, or Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614, which is a nice summation of some principles for BC, are not mentioned in recent cases.

Sedona Canada 2d, like its predecessor, shows a lack of understanding of the ERMS technology, i.e., no understanding of the need for standards to ensure the adequacy of electronic discovery, and its connection to proof of «systems integrity,» as is required by the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts.

Because most of the evidence used in legal proceedings now comes from complex electronic systems and devices, specialized legal research units like LAO LAW will be necessary for all lawyers.