While the foregoing points might be valid, the current omnipresence
of electronic legal research resources doesn't translate to omnipresent skill in their use.
The following Legal Research Updates are complimentary
electronic legal research newsletters, authored by National Legal Research Groups Senior Attorneys, that provide timely information on relevant case law developments and statutory and regulatory changes in the following legal specialty areas:
Today,
electronic legal research costs often are measured differently, access to the databases is usually much more widely available in a given firm than was previously the case, and use of electronic research is seen as necessary to complete most research assignments.
Loislaw was one of the
first electronic legal research services to offer smaller - firm lawyers a lower - cost alternative to Westlaw or LexisNexis for researching cases and statutes.
The Canadian Bar Association Guidelines for Practicing Ethically with New Information Technologies has a section
on electronic legal research.
In consideration of the fact that no clear justification has been provided to substantiate the amount claimed and the fact that I regard legal computerized research, unless otherwise proven, as office overhead expense as it compares to the subscription services law firms library had to maintain in the past and which were also considered office overhead, the disbursements claimed
for electronic legal research are not allowed.
[54] Counsel for Nordbank claims a total amount of $ 1,615.15 (Quicklaw: $ 1006.89 and Westlaw Carswell: $ 608.26) for
electronic legal research.
In a conversation the other day we touched on the differences between how (or if)
electronic legal research was taught when I was in law school, and then a few years later when I first instructed legal research and writing.
I would not allow a disbursement charge for «
electronic legal research» any more than I would allow a disbursement charge for subscribing to the O.R.'s.
The use of
electronic legal research (through services like Quicklaw or Westlaw in Canada) is almost a necessity in modern litigation.
In my view, disbursements for
electronic legal research are similar to disbursements for photocopying; it is the copies, not the copiers, that are being paid for.
The latter chapter focuses primarily on digest services, but also refers readers to the chapter on
Electronic Legal Research.
Because we offer so many tools for both print and
electronic legal research, we also offer regular training and refreshers on these products.