Sentences with phrase «electronic records management by»

That requires the application of the national standards of electronic records management by which to judge the state of ERMS management.

Not exact matches

SaaS apps are tools used by Healthcare providers and benefits them through various healthcare applications for their EMR (electronic medical record), EHR (electronic health record) software, and revenue cycle management software.

«Our results indicate that this simple intervention could be an effective and scalable approach to use the design of electronic health records to increase the rate of flu vaccinations, which are estimated to prevent millions of flu cases and tens of thousands of related hospitalizations every year,» said study lead author Mitesh S. Patel, MD, MBA, MS, an assistant professor of Medicine and Health Care Management in Penn's Perelman School of Medicine and The Wharton School, a staff physician at the Crescenz VA Medical Center, and director of the Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, whose work is supported by the Penn Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics.

UC San Diego Health achieves Stage 7 of electronic medical record (EMR) adoption — a ranking devised by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Analytics group and achieved by only 1.1 percent of U.S. hospitals in 2011.

Sedona Canada does not analyze: (1) the meaning and consequences of the «system integrity concept» in the e-records provisions of the Evidence Acts — proof of «records integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords provisions of the Evidence Acts — proof of «records integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords integrity» requires proof of «records system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords system integrity»; (2) the National Standard of Canada for e-records management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords management, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the nationalElectronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national stRecords as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 («72.34»); and, (3) the need of the parties to exchange verifications of compliance, provided by records management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords management experts, of their electronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the nationalelectronic records management systems (ERMS's) with the national strecords management systems (ERMS's) with the national standard.

Such certification of compliance work has been done for many years by experts in electronic records management.

Electronic corporate records management services are facilitated by ECORP.

See further: (1) «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» Slaw blog, Nov. 22, 2013; (2) «Electronic Discovery — Sedona Canada is Inadequate on Records Management — Here's Sedona Canada in Amended Form,» (2011), 9 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 135, by Ken Chasse («Chase»), LSUC & LSBC, in Toronto.

Whereas pre-electronic paper records management technology can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in the pool of water that is its ERMS.

My experience in working with experts in electronic records management systems since 1978, and being a legal advisor in the drafting of the National Standards of Canada that provide the principles and practices by which they should be regulated, leads me to believe that there is no records system that does not have some serious errors.

For many years he has worked with such experts by providing legal opinions in relation to their servicing the electronic records management systems of large institutions.

The corresponding increases in legal infrastructure necessitated by electronic records and information management technology will be much greater and develop much faster.

Even more dangerous to the rule of law: more such national standards will be required to serve the legislation that will be made necessary by our increasing dependence upon electronic records and information management technology.

It provides the necessary means of determining when an e-records management system has the necessary «system integrity» required by the admissibility rule that your ULCC working group wrote into the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts.

«Technologically competent» also requires knowledge of the electronic technology that now produces most of the evidence, and very frequently used types of evidence; for example, these kinds of evidence: (1) records are now the most frequently used kind of evidence but most often come from very complex electronic records management systems; (2) mobile phone tracking evidence because we all carry mobile phones; (3) breathalyzer device readings because they are the basis of more than 95 % of impaired driving cases; and, (4) expert opinion evidence that depends upon data produced by electronic systems and devices.

Such is also true of their legal departments, as is shown by the absence of ERMS issues in almost all case law and guidelines concerning the use of electronic records as evidence, including the four Sedona Canada Principles texts; see: Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Reviewelectronic records as evidence, including the four Sedona Canada Principles texts; see: Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 17records as evidence, including the four Sedona Canada Principles texts; see: Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law ReviewElectronic Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 17Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law ReviewElectronic Signature Law Review 17 (pdf).

(6) revising the records provisions of the Evidence Acts in Canada in support of these innovations by adding a «rebuttable presumption of inadequacy,» so as to enforce proof of compliance with the National Standards of Canada for electronic records management;

The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-electronic paper record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.

Supporting implementation by inventorying classified and unclassified records and integrating them into the established file structure, converting hardcopy to electronic formats, and training staff on use of records management software.

[4] Therefore, during e-discovery proceedings concerning large ERMSs, opposing lawyers should be asking one another: «Is your client's electronic records management system in compliance with the National Standard of Canada for electronic records management, and if so, when was the last time it was so certified by an expert in electronic records management?»

And it is the foundation concept of the National Standard of Canada for electronic records management: Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005, which is largely ignored by the legal profession and the caselaw of e-discovery and admielectronic records management: Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005, which is largely ignored by the legal profession and the caselaw of e-discovery and admissirecords management: Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005, which is largely ignored by the legal profession and the caselaw of e-discovery and admiElectronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005, which is largely ignored by the legal profession and the caselaw of e-discovery and admissiRecords as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005, which is largely ignored by the legal profession and the caselaw of e-discovery and admissibility.

Electronic discovery can not be made as simple and inexpensive as pre-electronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication createsElectronic discovery can not be made as simple and inexpensive as pre-electronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication createselectronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication createselectronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication createselectronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication createselectronic communication creates a record.

Better to increase the attractiveness of legal services by enabling lawyers to provide related services accompanying their legal services, e.g., family law lawyers providing financial planning advice, and law firms providing accounting and tax advisory work, and litigation lawyers working with experts who improve and maintain their clients» electronic records management systems, because records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» （ which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free doelectronic records management systems, because records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» （ which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downlrecords management systems, because records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» （ which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downlrecords are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» （ which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downlrecords management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» （ which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free doelectronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downlrecords provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 （ 1 ） （ a ） of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free doElectronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downlRecords as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downlrecords as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free download ） 。

The several innovations, concepts, and arguments developed in this article have been made possible by what I have learned from working with experts in electronic records management for many years.

This very varied evidentiary legislation situation, will produce a very inconsistent caselaw, one jurisdiction to the next, once judges and lawyers realize the consequences in law required by the fundamental difference between an electronic record and a pre-electronic paper record — in particular, the «system integrity concept» that is expressly stated in the electronic records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1) of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. electronic record and a pre-electronic paper record — in particular, the «system integrity concept» that is expressly stated in the electronic records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1) of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. electronic paper record — in particular, the «system integrity concept» that is expressly stated in the electronic records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1) of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. electronic records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1) of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. 22,records provisions; e.g.: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) of the Ontario Evidence Act; and, s. 31.2 (1) of the Canada Evidence Act (see my Slaw blog article, «The Dependence of Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. Electronic Discovery and Admissibility upon Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. Electronic Records Management,» published Nov. 22,Records Management,» published Nov. 22, 2013).

Give employers confidence in your data management knowledge and skills by becoming certified as an electronic health records specialist.

SELECTED ACHIEVEMENTS • Reduced paperwork by 67 % by introducing electronic records management system • Increased scheduling efficiency by 89 % by incorporating executive agenda information into company calendars • Decreased information retrieval time by 50 % by assisting in implementing a state of the art database system • Created a set of 100 memos and regular correspondence formats, which reduced emergency correspondence hassle

• Greet students and parents as they arrive at the school office and provide them with required information • Handle the PABX system, take and relay messages and transfer calls to intended recipients • Assist prospective students in filling out registration and admission forms by providing them with required field information • Provide students and parents with information on admission fees and term schedules • Create and distribute staff schedules and ensure that they are appropriately followed • Develop and maintain electronic filing and records management systems and ensure that data confidentiality is assured • Take and verify requests of information retrieval and ensure that records are properly and timely updated • Oversee the inventory system to ensure timely obtainment of school office supplies and equipment

ACHIEVEMENTS • Introduced a novel inventory cyclical procedure which dynamically counted each cycle and sent alerts to the controller • Reorganized the existing inventory control system, thereby resulting in efficiency gauged at 60 % • Conduced 15 staff workshops on supply chain management, logistics and material management • Revamped the inventory records system by introducing electronic records management, bringing down information pulling time by 80 %

SELECTED ACHIEVEMENTS • Streamlined student hall procedures by putting in place curfew timings and specific activity timings • Introduced innovative in - hall activities to assist new students in settling in with ease • Reduced student rebellion by 80 % by implementing a counselling service for «at risk» students • Implemented an electronic records management program which reduced paper cost by 70 %

• Determine the company's records management needs by analyzing information needs • Take audits of information created and stored within various systems in the company • Establish duration for which records need to be kept in accordance to legislative requirements • Store, arrange, index and classify records according to specified filing procedures • Facilitate the development and implementation of filing systems by providing proactive feedback • Oversee the management of both electronic and paper - based records • Identify the most appropriate records management resources and implement classification systems • Ascertain that no redundancy is evident when checking records and make sure that any identified ones are handled immediately • Maintain information on records and respond to requests for data retrieval from inside sources

KEY ACHIEVEMENTS • Reorganized the filing system by introducing more effective ways of records management, including electronic filing systems • Implemented a vast series of school procedures within a record time of 3 months • Reduced financial pressure on parents by suggesting that school supplies be provided by the school • Trained and inducted 15 new administrative employees within 5 months

Administrative Assistant focused on driving productivity by leveraging strong front office management... Meticulous attention to detail Proofreading Microsoft Office Staff motivation Electronic Medical Record (EMR)

Client Services Supervisor — Duties & Responsibilities Responsible for electronic payroll system operations for a large and economically diverse client base Recruit, train, and direct customer service, sales, technical, and administrative staff ensuring efficient operations Maintain working knowledge of proprietary software, industry best practices, employment law, and tax law Oversee adherence to departmental budgets, project timelines, and company policies Coordinate efforts between multiple departments resulting in timely and cost - effective project completion Design and implement professional development programs to enhance team skill sets Utilize employee recognition programs to build morale and dedication to company mission Represent company brand with poise, integrity, and positivity Study internal literature to become an expert on products and services Develop a rapport with customers and orient them to various products and services Encourage high customer retention by maintaining friendly, supportive contact with existing clients Interact with support staff and company resources effectively to create the best consumer experience Utilize technical proficiencies and industry knowledge to offer guidance and support to coworkers and clients Craft effective presentations and proposals, tailoring them to clients based on their specific needs and styles Maintain sales and customer service records detailing pricings, sales, activities reports, and other pertinent data Manage company financial records providing detailed, accurate account of transactions and financial health Build and strengthen long term relationships with peers, clients, partners, and industry leaders Provide additional operational support including communications, data entry, and other tasks as needed Consistently promoted due to excellence in management, customer service, technical support, and sales

Designed electronic file systems and maintained electronic and paper files.Handled all media and public relations inquiries.Maintained the front desk and reception area in a neat and organized fashion.Served as central point of contact for all outside vendors needing to gain access to the building.Facilitated working relationships with co-tenants and building management.Made copies, sent faxes and handled all incoming and outgoing correspondence.Created weekly and monthly reports and presentations.Organized files, developed spreadsheets, faxed reports and scanned documents.Properly routed agreements, contracts and invoices through the signature process.Managed the day - to - day calendar for the company's senior director.Received and screened a high volume of internal and external communications, including email and mail.Managed daily office operations and maintenance of equipment.Maintained detailed administrative and procedural processes to improve accuracy and efficiency.Coordinated meetings with other department managers and served as main liaison between sales and field staff.Scheduled and confirmed appointments for entire management team.Provided support for CEO and sales team in managing operation work flow.Successfully established effective systems for record retention by creating database for daily correspondence tracking.Developed more efficient filing systems and customer database protocols.Qualified competitive subcontractor bids prior to execution of contracts.Submitted all project closeout documents in accordance with the contract.Assigned projects and tasks to employees based on their competencies and specialties.Accurately provided status information on project progress to the project management.Monitored the safety of all construction activities, making on - site personnel safety the top priority.Acted as the liaison with company safety representatives to promote awareness and understanding of safety protocols.Increased the employee base by 50 % to meet changing staffing needs.Advised managers on organizational policy matters and recommend needed changes.Conducted new employee orientation to foster positive attitude toward organizational objectives.Directed personnel, training and labor relations activities.Served as a link between management and employees by handling questions, interpreting and administering contracts and helping resolve work - related problems.