Teachers can easily collect student work samples to monitor individual progress and even build
Electronic Student Portfolios.
Not exact matches
Melinda became excited about
electronic portfolios; her middle school
students now are creating e-
portfolios that highlight their best work.
The school uses
electronic portfolios for documenting
students» academic growth and success.
Helen Barrett agreed, saying, «
Electronic portfolios work best with
students who have the technological capabilities to develop and maintain their own
portfolios.»
Learn what
electronic portfolios are and discover how they can help you and benefit your
students.
Students are given online accounts with passwords to track classes; create an
electronic portfolio of grades, test scores, and work; research careers; and organize their college search.
These resources and
students»
electronic portfolios can be used for curriculum planning, differentiating instruction, and individual and small group project based learning.
Although the results were positive, researchers were disappointed that few
students planned to use
electronic portfolios in their own teaching.
Twenty - two
students agreed that their
electronic portfolios looked professional, and 19 believed that the
portfolios reflected them as professionals.
Two views of
electronic portfolios in teacher education: Non-technology undergraduates and technology graduate
students.
As in the studies cited previously, few believed they would have their own
students create
electronic portfolios.
On the final three items,
students rated the assignment above 7 on a 10 - point scale when compared to other assignments (M = 7.30), in overall satisfaction with the assignment (M = 7.57), and in overall satisfaction with their own
electronic portfolios (M = 7.87).
Regarding structure of
electronic portfolios, some
students thought there should have been more explicit guidelines, even a template.
The undergraduate
students» responses indicated that they believed the experience of creating
electronic portfolios increased the likelihood they would use technology in their future employment, a finding supported by previous research (Goldsby & Fazal, 2000; McKinney, 1998).
Educational technology was not a requirement of their program, so
students entered with limited knowledge of the technology needed to create
electronic portfolios.
When evaluating the
electronic portfolio assignment,
students were most likely to agree they had adequate access to technical support, followed by adequate access to equipment, needed equipment, and needed software (see Table 5).
This group of
students was much less likely to agree that they would advocate for
electronic portfolios for accreditation,
student assessment or teacher assessment.
When asked what they learned from creating
electronic portfolios,
students were most likely to respond that they had learned to use hardware and / or software, and they had learned how to use technology to organize and present ideas.
In the all - important area of transfer, all but one
student agreed that they can apply what they learned while creating
electronic portfolios to their teaching (see Table 3).
In a recent study, Sherry (2001) found that most of her graduate
students who created
electronic portfolios planned to retain the standards - based framework when adding to and revising their
portfolios after graduation, even though many were initially hesitant about overtly addressing standards for their field.
In the learning category, all but one
student agreed that they learned about technology from the
electronic portfolio assignment (see Table 2).
By using
electronic portfolios, teacher educators serve as models of technology use, while they provide opportunities for
students to apply their technology knowledge (Kariuki, Franklin, & Duran, 2001).
Students were less likely to agree that
electronic portfolios are more powerful and convenient than traditional
portfolios or that they would like to put their
portfolios on the Web.
Eight
students agreed that the
electronic portfolios should be optional, and the same number believed it should be graded instead of credit / no credit.
After submitting their final
portfolios,
students» perspectives about
electronic portfolios were captured on a 72 - item survey they were asked to complete (see appendix for a copy of the survey).
Electronic portfolios caught her interest because they provide a way for
students to show clear evidence of their teaching development in a form that is easy to share, update, and store.
Even though this faculty member lacked a strong background in technology, she determined to implement
electronic portfolios with her
students and to study the effectiveness of this innovative assessment approach in collaboration with an educational technology colleague.
Twenty
students agreed that
electronic portfolios can be used to showcase teaching and learning.
At the end of the first and second semesters of their program, the
students had responded to open - ended questions concerning what they had learned, potential uses of their
portfolio, and the advantages and disadvantages of
electronic portfolios (Bartlett, 2002).
Students reported the major advantages: (a)
electronic portfolios are more powerful and convenient than traditional
portfolios, and (b) they learned about technology.
Three additional items asked
students to rate the
electronic portfolio assignment on a 10 - point scale, and the final item asked whether
students thought the
electronic portfolio assignment had been worth the time spent.
All ProTeach preservice teacher education
students are required to develop an
electronic portfolio over the course of their study (http://www.coe.ufl.edu/school/
portfolio/index.htm).
While traditional grades will still be required by the university, an
electronic performance - based
portfolio system will be established to allow
students a venue to reflect on and demonstrate growth, to develop a working knowledge of pedagogy, (Carroll, Potthoff, & Huber, 1996), and to hone a professional voice (McKinney, 1998).
requires
students to present
electronic portfolios as a culminating event in the program.
In what ways can
electronic portfolios serve as a medium for effective
student self - assessment?