The adjudicator involved looks at the situation and asks whether there was a transfer
of certain
elements including inventory, business processes, IT systems,
employment policies, distribution networks, trade fixtures, customer loyalty programs,
contracts or accounts, brands, leases, etcetera.
PRINCIPLE (1): BASIS
OF A CONTRACT The element of personal service has figured significantly in many of the recent cases on employment status, but the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship at al
OF A
CONTRACT The element of personal service has figured significantly in many of the recent cases on employment status, but the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship
CONTRACT The
element of personal service has figured significantly in many of the recent cases on employment status, but the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship at al
of personal service has figured significantly in many
of the recent cases on employment status, but the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship at al
of the recent cases on
employment status, but the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationsh
employment status, but the decision
of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship at al
of the
Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationsh
Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) under Elias P in Ellis v M&P Steelcraft Ltd and another [2008] IRLR 355, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Feb) adds a new twist to it, shading into what in traditional
contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship
contract law would be known as «intention to create legal relations», ie was there any contemplation
of any form of employment being the basis of the relationship at al
of any form
of employment being the basis of the relationship at al
of employment being the basis of the relationsh
employment being the basis
of the relationship at al
of the relationship at all?