As long as a plaintiff in a suit can prove the four
elements of a malpractice claim (existence of duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages), then a tort can be pursued.
Such malpractice actions require proof of
each element of a malpractice claim — duty, breach, injury, causation, and damages — by a preponderance of the evidence and may require the testimony of experts with respect to more than one of these elements.
Not exact matches
The last post in our series about the essential
elements of a medical
malpractice claim is about causation.
Presenting Your Evidence at Trial In, the plaintiff, or the person bringing a
claim of medical
malpractice has the burden
of proving every
element of the case by a preponderance
of the evidence.
Topics discussed include: strategies for identifying the required
elements for a potential
malpractice action; the evaluation
of the defenses that might bar recovery or defeat a
claim; establishing or refuting the applicable standard
of care with expert testimony; identifying when a conflict
of interest results in divided loyalties, when such a conflict may form the basis
of a
claim, and the defenses to such conflict
of interest
claims; and distinguishing
malpractice liability from a violation
of professional ethical standards and if or when such standards are relevant to litigating a
malpractice claim.
The overall theme
of this webinar addresses identifying legal
malpractice as a
claim, the
elements necessary to sustain such a
claim, and the available defenses that may bar or defeat such an action.
Negligence is just one
element of a medical
malpractice claim which involves injury being caused to a patient.
Wrongful birth is a medical
malpractice claim, so the patient needs to prove the basic
elements of a medical
malpractice claim.