Sentences with phrase «email evidence released»

Not exact matches

FBI Director James Comey has repeatedly said that there's «no evidence» Clinton's emails were deleted in an attempt to hide them, and all of the documents released by the FBI's investigation since then have backed that up that conclusion.

After the suit went public, Avenatti unearthed and released an email proving that Cohen used his Trump Organization email account to arrange the wire transfer to Daniels, which could serve as additional evidence that Cohen is lying when he says Trump had no knowledge of the deal.

That doesn't constitute proof of lack of impact, merely lack of any evidence of impact that can be measured by them (and the implication was that, due to slow speed of Wikileaks releases and lack of any dramatic info in the emails; any impact is pretty much impossible to measure).

My sense about the climate emails that have been stolen and the information they have provided is that they have released a barrage of additional information which makes clear the robustness of the science, the multitude, the enormous multitude of different strands of evidence that support the urgency and the severity of the problem, that have been managed in multiple places around the world.

HL has commenced it's campaign to blame Gleick without much evidence and releasing emails that are not verifiable by a 3rd party, nor do we know if that is the entire story.

The evidence shows that the emails were released by a conscientious employee rather than stolen by a hacker.

The university says it has «no evidence of a recent breach in our systems», and suggests that the cache — posted on a Russian server — has «the appearance of having been held back after the theft of data and emails in 2009 to be released at a time designed to cause maximum disruption to the imminent international climate talks».

If you have specific information concerning unethical behaviour and lying (e.g. such as that evidenced in the released emails) by Steve or other CA participants then bring it forward... or get off the pot.

the NOAA press release dated Feb 24, 2011 entitled» Inspector General's Review of Stolen Emails Confirms No Evidence of Wrong - Doing by NOAA Climate Scientists» contains a statement which is contradicted by the report of the Inspector General

However, since the emails were released, and despite the fact that there is no evidence within them to support any of these claims of fraud and fabrication, the UK media has opened itself so wide to the spectrum of thought on climate that the GW hoaxers have now suddenly find themselves well within the mainstream.