The Anglican church stands squarely in the Reformed tradition, yet
embraces Church tradition as that which connects all generations of believers together and gives us a starting point for our interpretation of Scripture.
Not exact matches
It is no surprise that the Emperor Constantine created the belief /
church / assembly of Roman peoples that
embraced the «universal / καθολικη» values of the Roman Empire, a popular mix of «compromised Christian» and non Christian beliefs and
traditions.
«For some reason, in evangelical and charismatic
churches, we didn't
embrace the contemplative
tradition,» he says.
Dismissing
tradition as representing only the worldliness of the
church reflects unbelief in the Spirit's work since Pentecost as the
church's teacher;
embracing the dogma of faultless
tradition reflects a lapse into ecclesiastical perfectionism.
Many
churches find themselves in similar circumstances, particularly Reformed
traditions that
embrace a theology that emphasizes the priesthood of all believers.
I began to let go of many things and
embrace new and came to the conclusion that Western
Church and theology has misunderstood Jesus life and teachings altogether as IMO it can only be understood from a Eastern Spiritual
Tradition perspective.
She wants open dialog and mutual respect, and would like to see the
tradition in which she was raised and obviously still loves continue to
embrace her as she endeavors to re-articulate theology, expand the
church's borders, and open its doors to more and more people who have been marginalized and even excluded.